57 lines
3.1 KiB
ReStructuredText
57 lines
3.1 KiB
ReStructuredText
|
.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
|
||
|
|
.. include:: <isonum.txt>
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
===========================
|
||
|
|
Power Management Strategies
|
||
|
|
===========================
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
:Copyright: |copy| 2017 Intel Corporation
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
:Author: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The Linux kernel supports two major high-level power management strategies.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
One of them is based on using global low-power states of the whole system in
|
||
|
|
which user space code cannot be executed and the overall system activity is
|
||
|
|
significantly reduced, referred to as :doc:`sleep states <sleep-states>`. The
|
||
|
|
kernel puts the system into one of these states when requested by user space
|
||
|
|
and the system stays in it until a special signal is received from one of
|
||
|
|
designated devices, triggering a transition to the ``working state`` in which
|
||
|
|
user space code can run. Because sleep states are global and the whole system
|
||
|
|
is affected by the state changes, this strategy is referred to as the
|
||
|
|
:doc:`system-wide power management <system-wide>`.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The other strategy, referred to as the :doc:`working-state power management
|
||
|
|
<working-state>`, is based on adjusting the power states of individual hardware
|
||
|
|
components of the system, as needed, in the working state. In consequence, if
|
||
|
|
this strategy is in use, the working state of the system usually does not
|
||
|
|
correspond to any particular physical configuration of it, but can be treated as
|
||
|
|
a metastate covering a range of different power states of the system in which
|
||
|
|
the individual components of it can be either ``active`` (in use) or
|
||
|
|
``inactive`` (idle). If they are active, they have to be in power states
|
||
|
|
allowing them to process data and to be accessed by software. In turn, if they
|
||
|
|
are inactive, ideally, they should be in low-power states in which they may not
|
||
|
|
be accessible.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
If all of the system components are active, the system as a whole is regarded as
|
||
|
|
"runtime active" and that situation typically corresponds to the maximum power
|
||
|
|
draw (or maximum energy usage) of it. If all of them are inactive, the system
|
||
|
|
as a whole is regarded as "runtime idle" which may be very close to a sleep
|
||
|
|
state from the physical system configuration and power draw perspective, but
|
||
|
|
then it takes much less time and effort to start executing user space code than
|
||
|
|
for the same system in a sleep state. However, transitions from sleep states
|
||
|
|
back to the working state can only be started by a limited set of devices, so
|
||
|
|
typically the system can spend much more time in a sleep state than it can be
|
||
|
|
runtime idle in one go. For this reason, systems usually use less energy in
|
||
|
|
sleep states than when they are runtime idle most of the time.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Moreover, the two power management strategies address different usage scenarios.
|
||
|
|
Namely, if the user indicates that the system will not be in use going forward,
|
||
|
|
for example by closing its lid (if the system is a laptop), it probably should
|
||
|
|
go into a sleep state at that point. On the other hand, if the user simply goes
|
||
|
|
away from the laptop keyboard, it probably should stay in the working state and
|
||
|
|
use the working-state power management in case it becomes idle, because the user
|
||
|
|
may come back to it at any time and then may want the system to be immediately
|
||
|
|
accessible.
|