502 lines
21 KiB
ReStructuredText
502 lines
21 KiB
ReStructuredText
|
.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
|
||
|
|
||
|
==================================
|
||
|
relay interface (formerly relayfs)
|
||
|
==================================
|
||
|
|
||
|
The relay interface provides a means for kernel applications to
|
||
|
efficiently log and transfer large quantities of data from the kernel
|
||
|
to userspace via user-defined 'relay channels'.
|
||
|
|
||
|
A 'relay channel' is a kernel->user data relay mechanism implemented
|
||
|
as a set of per-cpu kernel buffers ('channel buffers'), each
|
||
|
represented as a regular file ('relay file') in user space. Kernel
|
||
|
clients write into the channel buffers using efficient write
|
||
|
functions; these automatically log into the current cpu's channel
|
||
|
buffer. User space applications mmap() or read() from the relay files
|
||
|
and retrieve the data as it becomes available. The relay files
|
||
|
themselves are files created in a host filesystem, e.g. debugfs, and
|
||
|
are associated with the channel buffers using the API described below.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The format of the data logged into the channel buffers is completely
|
||
|
up to the kernel client; the relay interface does however provide
|
||
|
hooks which allow kernel clients to impose some structure on the
|
||
|
buffer data. The relay interface doesn't implement any form of data
|
||
|
filtering - this also is left to the kernel client. The purpose is to
|
||
|
keep things as simple as possible.
|
||
|
|
||
|
This document provides an overview of the relay interface API. The
|
||
|
details of the function parameters are documented along with the
|
||
|
functions in the relay interface code - please see that for details.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Semantics
|
||
|
=========
|
||
|
|
||
|
Each relay channel has one buffer per CPU, each buffer has one or more
|
||
|
sub-buffers. Messages are written to the first sub-buffer until it is
|
||
|
too full to contain a new message, in which case it is written to
|
||
|
the next (if available). Messages are never split across sub-buffers.
|
||
|
At this point, userspace can be notified so it empties the first
|
||
|
sub-buffer, while the kernel continues writing to the next.
|
||
|
|
||
|
When notified that a sub-buffer is full, the kernel knows how many
|
||
|
bytes of it are padding i.e. unused space occurring because a complete
|
||
|
message couldn't fit into a sub-buffer. Userspace can use this
|
||
|
knowledge to copy only valid data.
|
||
|
|
||
|
After copying it, userspace can notify the kernel that a sub-buffer
|
||
|
has been consumed.
|
||
|
|
||
|
A relay channel can operate in a mode where it will overwrite data not
|
||
|
yet collected by userspace, and not wait for it to be consumed.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The relay channel itself does not provide for communication of such
|
||
|
data between userspace and kernel, allowing the kernel side to remain
|
||
|
simple and not impose a single interface on userspace. It does
|
||
|
provide a set of examples and a separate helper though, described
|
||
|
below.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The read() interface both removes padding and internally consumes the
|
||
|
read sub-buffers; thus in cases where read(2) is being used to drain
|
||
|
the channel buffers, special-purpose communication between kernel and
|
||
|
user isn't necessary for basic operation.
|
||
|
|
||
|
One of the major goals of the relay interface is to provide a low
|
||
|
overhead mechanism for conveying kernel data to userspace. While the
|
||
|
read() interface is easy to use, it's not as efficient as the mmap()
|
||
|
approach; the example code attempts to make the tradeoff between the
|
||
|
two approaches as small as possible.
|
||
|
|
||
|
klog and relay-apps example code
|
||
|
================================
|
||
|
|
||
|
The relay interface itself is ready to use, but to make things easier,
|
||
|
a couple simple utility functions and a set of examples are provided.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The relay-apps example tarball, available on the relay sourceforge
|
||
|
site, contains a set of self-contained examples, each consisting of a
|
||
|
pair of .c files containing boilerplate code for each of the user and
|
||
|
kernel sides of a relay application. When combined these two sets of
|
||
|
boilerplate code provide glue to easily stream data to disk, without
|
||
|
having to bother with mundane housekeeping chores.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The 'klog debugging functions' patch (klog.patch in the relay-apps
|
||
|
tarball) provides a couple of high-level logging functions to the
|
||
|
kernel which allow writing formatted text or raw data to a channel,
|
||
|
regardless of whether a channel to write into exists or not, or even
|
||
|
whether the relay interface is compiled into the kernel or not. These
|
||
|
functions allow you to put unconditional 'trace' statements anywhere
|
||
|
in the kernel or kernel modules; only when there is a 'klog handler'
|
||
|
registered will data actually be logged (see the klog and kleak
|
||
|
examples for details).
|
||
|
|
||
|
It is of course possible to use the relay interface from scratch,
|
||
|
i.e. without using any of the relay-apps example code or klog, but
|
||
|
you'll have to implement communication between userspace and kernel,
|
||
|
allowing both to convey the state of buffers (full, empty, amount of
|
||
|
padding). The read() interface both removes padding and internally
|
||
|
consumes the read sub-buffers; thus in cases where read(2) is being
|
||
|
used to drain the channel buffers, special-purpose communication
|
||
|
between kernel and user isn't necessary for basic operation. Things
|
||
|
such as buffer-full conditions would still need to be communicated via
|
||
|
some channel though.
|
||
|
|
||
|
klog and the relay-apps examples can be found in the relay-apps
|
||
|
tarball on http://relayfs.sourceforge.net
|
||
|
|
||
|
The relay interface user space API
|
||
|
==================================
|
||
|
|
||
|
The relay interface implements basic file operations for user space
|
||
|
access to relay channel buffer data. Here are the file operations
|
||
|
that are available and some comments regarding their behavior:
|
||
|
|
||
|
=========== ============================================================
|
||
|
open() enables user to open an _existing_ channel buffer.
|
||
|
|
||
|
mmap() results in channel buffer being mapped into the caller's
|
||
|
memory space. Note that you can't do a partial mmap - you
|
||
|
must map the entire file, which is NRBUF * SUBBUFSIZE.
|
||
|
|
||
|
read() read the contents of a channel buffer. The bytes read are
|
||
|
'consumed' by the reader, i.e. they won't be available
|
||
|
again to subsequent reads. If the channel is being used
|
||
|
in no-overwrite mode (the default), it can be read at any
|
||
|
time even if there's an active kernel writer. If the
|
||
|
channel is being used in overwrite mode and there are
|
||
|
active channel writers, results may be unpredictable -
|
||
|
users should make sure that all logging to the channel has
|
||
|
ended before using read() with overwrite mode. Sub-buffer
|
||
|
padding is automatically removed and will not be seen by
|
||
|
the reader.
|
||
|
|
||
|
sendfile() transfer data from a channel buffer to an output file
|
||
|
descriptor. Sub-buffer padding is automatically removed
|
||
|
and will not be seen by the reader.
|
||
|
|
||
|
poll() POLLIN/POLLRDNORM/POLLERR supported. User applications are
|
||
|
notified when sub-buffer boundaries are crossed.
|
||
|
|
||
|
close() decrements the channel buffer's refcount. When the refcount
|
||
|
reaches 0, i.e. when no process or kernel client has the
|
||
|
buffer open, the channel buffer is freed.
|
||
|
=========== ============================================================
|
||
|
|
||
|
In order for a user application to make use of relay files, the
|
||
|
host filesystem must be mounted. For example::
|
||
|
|
||
|
mount -t debugfs debugfs /sys/kernel/debug
|
||
|
|
||
|
.. Note::
|
||
|
|
||
|
the host filesystem doesn't need to be mounted for kernel
|
||
|
clients to create or use channels - it only needs to be
|
||
|
mounted when user space applications need access to the buffer
|
||
|
data.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
The relay interface kernel API
|
||
|
==============================
|
||
|
|
||
|
Here's a summary of the API the relay interface provides to in-kernel clients:
|
||
|
|
||
|
TBD(curr. line MT:/API/)
|
||
|
channel management functions::
|
||
|
|
||
|
relay_open(base_filename, parent, subbuf_size, n_subbufs,
|
||
|
callbacks, private_data)
|
||
|
relay_close(chan)
|
||
|
relay_flush(chan)
|
||
|
relay_reset(chan)
|
||
|
|
||
|
channel management typically called on instigation of userspace::
|
||
|
|
||
|
relay_subbufs_consumed(chan, cpu, subbufs_consumed)
|
||
|
|
||
|
write functions::
|
||
|
|
||
|
relay_write(chan, data, length)
|
||
|
__relay_write(chan, data, length)
|
||
|
relay_reserve(chan, length)
|
||
|
|
||
|
callbacks::
|
||
|
|
||
|
subbuf_start(buf, subbuf, prev_subbuf, prev_padding)
|
||
|
buf_mapped(buf, filp)
|
||
|
buf_unmapped(buf, filp)
|
||
|
create_buf_file(filename, parent, mode, buf, is_global)
|
||
|
remove_buf_file(dentry)
|
||
|
|
||
|
helper functions::
|
||
|
|
||
|
relay_buf_full(buf)
|
||
|
subbuf_start_reserve(buf, length)
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
Creating a channel
|
||
|
------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
relay_open() is used to create a channel, along with its per-cpu
|
||
|
channel buffers. Each channel buffer will have an associated file
|
||
|
created for it in the host filesystem, which can be and mmapped or
|
||
|
read from in user space. The files are named basename0...basenameN-1
|
||
|
where N is the number of online cpus, and by default will be created
|
||
|
in the root of the filesystem (if the parent param is NULL). If you
|
||
|
want a directory structure to contain your relay files, you should
|
||
|
create it using the host filesystem's directory creation function,
|
||
|
e.g. debugfs_create_dir(), and pass the parent directory to
|
||
|
relay_open(). Users are responsible for cleaning up any directory
|
||
|
structure they create, when the channel is closed - again the host
|
||
|
filesystem's directory removal functions should be used for that,
|
||
|
e.g. debugfs_remove().
|
||
|
|
||
|
In order for a channel to be created and the host filesystem's files
|
||
|
associated with its channel buffers, the user must provide definitions
|
||
|
for two callback functions, create_buf_file() and remove_buf_file().
|
||
|
create_buf_file() is called once for each per-cpu buffer from
|
||
|
relay_open() and allows the user to create the file which will be used
|
||
|
to represent the corresponding channel buffer. The callback should
|
||
|
return the dentry of the file created to represent the channel buffer.
|
||
|
remove_buf_file() must also be defined; it's responsible for deleting
|
||
|
the file(s) created in create_buf_file() and is called during
|
||
|
relay_close().
|
||
|
|
||
|
Here are some typical definitions for these callbacks, in this case
|
||
|
using debugfs::
|
||
|
|
||
|
/*
|
||
|
* create_buf_file() callback. Creates relay file in debugfs.
|
||
|
*/
|
||
|
static struct dentry *create_buf_file_handler(const char *filename,
|
||
|
struct dentry *parent,
|
||
|
umode_t mode,
|
||
|
struct rchan_buf *buf,
|
||
|
int *is_global)
|
||
|
{
|
||
|
return debugfs_create_file(filename, mode, parent, buf,
|
||
|
&relay_file_operations);
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
|
||
|
/*
|
||
|
* remove_buf_file() callback. Removes relay file from debugfs.
|
||
|
*/
|
||
|
static int remove_buf_file_handler(struct dentry *dentry)
|
||
|
{
|
||
|
debugfs_remove(dentry);
|
||
|
|
||
|
return 0;
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
|
||
|
/*
|
||
|
* relay interface callbacks
|
||
|
*/
|
||
|
static struct rchan_callbacks relay_callbacks =
|
||
|
{
|
||
|
.create_buf_file = create_buf_file_handler,
|
||
|
.remove_buf_file = remove_buf_file_handler,
|
||
|
};
|
||
|
|
||
|
And an example relay_open() invocation using them::
|
||
|
|
||
|
chan = relay_open("cpu", NULL, SUBBUF_SIZE, N_SUBBUFS, &relay_callbacks, NULL);
|
||
|
|
||
|
If the create_buf_file() callback fails, or isn't defined, channel
|
||
|
creation and thus relay_open() will fail.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The total size of each per-cpu buffer is calculated by multiplying the
|
||
|
number of sub-buffers by the sub-buffer size passed into relay_open().
|
||
|
The idea behind sub-buffers is that they're basically an extension of
|
||
|
double-buffering to N buffers, and they also allow applications to
|
||
|
easily implement random-access-on-buffer-boundary schemes, which can
|
||
|
be important for some high-volume applications. The number and size
|
||
|
of sub-buffers is completely dependent on the application and even for
|
||
|
the same application, different conditions will warrant different
|
||
|
values for these parameters at different times. Typically, the right
|
||
|
values to use are best decided after some experimentation; in general,
|
||
|
though, it's safe to assume that having only 1 sub-buffer is a bad
|
||
|
idea - you're guaranteed to either overwrite data or lose events
|
||
|
depending on the channel mode being used.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The create_buf_file() implementation can also be defined in such a way
|
||
|
as to allow the creation of a single 'global' buffer instead of the
|
||
|
default per-cpu set. This can be useful for applications interested
|
||
|
mainly in seeing the relative ordering of system-wide events without
|
||
|
the need to bother with saving explicit timestamps for the purpose of
|
||
|
merging/sorting per-cpu files in a postprocessing step.
|
||
|
|
||
|
To have relay_open() create a global buffer, the create_buf_file()
|
||
|
implementation should set the value of the is_global outparam to a
|
||
|
non-zero value in addition to creating the file that will be used to
|
||
|
represent the single buffer. In the case of a global buffer,
|
||
|
create_buf_file() and remove_buf_file() will be called only once. The
|
||
|
normal channel-writing functions, e.g. relay_write(), can still be
|
||
|
used - writes from any cpu will transparently end up in the global
|
||
|
buffer - but since it is a global buffer, callers should make sure
|
||
|
they use the proper locking for such a buffer, either by wrapping
|
||
|
writes in a spinlock, or by copying a write function from relay.h and
|
||
|
creating a local version that internally does the proper locking.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The private_data passed into relay_open() allows clients to associate
|
||
|
user-defined data with a channel, and is immediately available
|
||
|
(including in create_buf_file()) via chan->private_data or
|
||
|
buf->chan->private_data.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Buffer-only channels
|
||
|
--------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
These channels have no files associated and can be created with
|
||
|
relay_open(NULL, NULL, ...). Such channels are useful in scenarios such
|
||
|
as when doing early tracing in the kernel, before the VFS is up. In these
|
||
|
cases, one may open a buffer-only channel and then call
|
||
|
relay_late_setup_files() when the kernel is ready to handle files,
|
||
|
to expose the buffered data to the userspace.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Channel 'modes'
|
||
|
---------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
relay channels can be used in either of two modes - 'overwrite' or
|
||
|
'no-overwrite'. The mode is entirely determined by the implementation
|
||
|
of the subbuf_start() callback, as described below. The default if no
|
||
|
subbuf_start() callback is defined is 'no-overwrite' mode. If the
|
||
|
default mode suits your needs, and you plan to use the read()
|
||
|
interface to retrieve channel data, you can ignore the details of this
|
||
|
section, as it pertains mainly to mmap() implementations.
|
||
|
|
||
|
In 'overwrite' mode, also known as 'flight recorder' mode, writes
|
||
|
continuously cycle around the buffer and will never fail, but will
|
||
|
unconditionally overwrite old data regardless of whether it's actually
|
||
|
been consumed. In no-overwrite mode, writes will fail, i.e. data will
|
||
|
be lost, if the number of unconsumed sub-buffers equals the total
|
||
|
number of sub-buffers in the channel. It should be clear that if
|
||
|
there is no consumer or if the consumer can't consume sub-buffers fast
|
||
|
enough, data will be lost in either case; the only difference is
|
||
|
whether data is lost from the beginning or the end of a buffer.
|
||
|
|
||
|
As explained above, a relay channel is made of up one or more
|
||
|
per-cpu channel buffers, each implemented as a circular buffer
|
||
|
subdivided into one or more sub-buffers. Messages are written into
|
||
|
the current sub-buffer of the channel's current per-cpu buffer via the
|
||
|
write functions described below. Whenever a message can't fit into
|
||
|
the current sub-buffer, because there's no room left for it, the
|
||
|
client is notified via the subbuf_start() callback that a switch to a
|
||
|
new sub-buffer is about to occur. The client uses this callback to 1)
|
||
|
initialize the next sub-buffer if appropriate 2) finalize the previous
|
||
|
sub-buffer if appropriate and 3) return a boolean value indicating
|
||
|
whether or not to actually move on to the next sub-buffer.
|
||
|
|
||
|
To implement 'no-overwrite' mode, the userspace client would provide
|
||
|
an implementation of the subbuf_start() callback something like the
|
||
|
following::
|
||
|
|
||
|
static int subbuf_start(struct rchan_buf *buf,
|
||
|
void *subbuf,
|
||
|
void *prev_subbuf,
|
||
|
unsigned int prev_padding)
|
||
|
{
|
||
|
if (prev_subbuf)
|
||
|
*((unsigned *)prev_subbuf) = prev_padding;
|
||
|
|
||
|
if (relay_buf_full(buf))
|
||
|
return 0;
|
||
|
|
||
|
subbuf_start_reserve(buf, sizeof(unsigned int));
|
||
|
|
||
|
return 1;
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
|
||
|
If the current buffer is full, i.e. all sub-buffers remain unconsumed,
|
||
|
the callback returns 0 to indicate that the buffer switch should not
|
||
|
occur yet, i.e. until the consumer has had a chance to read the
|
||
|
current set of ready sub-buffers. For the relay_buf_full() function
|
||
|
to make sense, the consumer is responsible for notifying the relay
|
||
|
interface when sub-buffers have been consumed via
|
||
|
relay_subbufs_consumed(). Any subsequent attempts to write into the
|
||
|
buffer will again invoke the subbuf_start() callback with the same
|
||
|
parameters; only when the consumer has consumed one or more of the
|
||
|
ready sub-buffers will relay_buf_full() return 0, in which case the
|
||
|
buffer switch can continue.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The implementation of the subbuf_start() callback for 'overwrite' mode
|
||
|
would be very similar::
|
||
|
|
||
|
static int subbuf_start(struct rchan_buf *buf,
|
||
|
void *subbuf,
|
||
|
void *prev_subbuf,
|
||
|
size_t prev_padding)
|
||
|
{
|
||
|
if (prev_subbuf)
|
||
|
*((unsigned *)prev_subbuf) = prev_padding;
|
||
|
|
||
|
subbuf_start_reserve(buf, sizeof(unsigned int));
|
||
|
|
||
|
return 1;
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
|
||
|
In this case, the relay_buf_full() check is meaningless and the
|
||
|
callback always returns 1, causing the buffer switch to occur
|
||
|
unconditionally. It's also meaningless for the client to use the
|
||
|
relay_subbufs_consumed() function in this mode, as it's never
|
||
|
consulted.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The default subbuf_start() implementation, used if the client doesn't
|
||
|
define any callbacks, or doesn't define the subbuf_start() callback,
|
||
|
implements the simplest possible 'no-overwrite' mode, i.e. it does
|
||
|
nothing but return 0.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Header information can be reserved at the beginning of each sub-buffer
|
||
|
by calling the subbuf_start_reserve() helper function from within the
|
||
|
subbuf_start() callback. This reserved area can be used to store
|
||
|
whatever information the client wants. In the example above, room is
|
||
|
reserved in each sub-buffer to store the padding count for that
|
||
|
sub-buffer. This is filled in for the previous sub-buffer in the
|
||
|
subbuf_start() implementation; the padding value for the previous
|
||
|
sub-buffer is passed into the subbuf_start() callback along with a
|
||
|
pointer to the previous sub-buffer, since the padding value isn't
|
||
|
known until a sub-buffer is filled. The subbuf_start() callback is
|
||
|
also called for the first sub-buffer when the channel is opened, to
|
||
|
give the client a chance to reserve space in it. In this case the
|
||
|
previous sub-buffer pointer passed into the callback will be NULL, so
|
||
|
the client should check the value of the prev_subbuf pointer before
|
||
|
writing into the previous sub-buffer.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Writing to a channel
|
||
|
--------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
Kernel clients write data into the current cpu's channel buffer using
|
||
|
relay_write() or __relay_write(). relay_write() is the main logging
|
||
|
function - it uses local_irqsave() to protect the buffer and should be
|
||
|
used if you might be logging from interrupt context. If you know
|
||
|
you'll never be logging from interrupt context, you can use
|
||
|
__relay_write(), which only disables preemption. These functions
|
||
|
don't return a value, so you can't determine whether or not they
|
||
|
failed - the assumption is that you wouldn't want to check a return
|
||
|
value in the fast logging path anyway, and that they'll always succeed
|
||
|
unless the buffer is full and no-overwrite mode is being used, in
|
||
|
which case you can detect a failed write in the subbuf_start()
|
||
|
callback by calling the relay_buf_full() helper function.
|
||
|
|
||
|
relay_reserve() is used to reserve a slot in a channel buffer which
|
||
|
can be written to later. This would typically be used in applications
|
||
|
that need to write directly into a channel buffer without having to
|
||
|
stage data in a temporary buffer beforehand. Because the actual write
|
||
|
may not happen immediately after the slot is reserved, applications
|
||
|
using relay_reserve() can keep a count of the number of bytes actually
|
||
|
written, either in space reserved in the sub-buffers themselves or as
|
||
|
a separate array. See the 'reserve' example in the relay-apps tarball
|
||
|
at http://relayfs.sourceforge.net for an example of how this can be
|
||
|
done. Because the write is under control of the client and is
|
||
|
separated from the reserve, relay_reserve() doesn't protect the buffer
|
||
|
at all - it's up to the client to provide the appropriate
|
||
|
synchronization when using relay_reserve().
|
||
|
|
||
|
Closing a channel
|
||
|
-----------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
The client calls relay_close() when it's finished using the channel.
|
||
|
The channel and its associated buffers are destroyed when there are no
|
||
|
longer any references to any of the channel buffers. relay_flush()
|
||
|
forces a sub-buffer switch on all the channel buffers, and can be used
|
||
|
to finalize and process the last sub-buffers before the channel is
|
||
|
closed.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Misc
|
||
|
----
|
||
|
|
||
|
Some applications may want to keep a channel around and re-use it
|
||
|
rather than open and close a new channel for each use. relay_reset()
|
||
|
can be used for this purpose - it resets a channel to its initial
|
||
|
state without reallocating channel buffer memory or destroying
|
||
|
existing mappings. It should however only be called when it's safe to
|
||
|
do so, i.e. when the channel isn't currently being written to.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Finally, there are a couple of utility callbacks that can be used for
|
||
|
different purposes. buf_mapped() is called whenever a channel buffer
|
||
|
is mmapped from user space and buf_unmapped() is called when it's
|
||
|
unmapped. The client can use this notification to trigger actions
|
||
|
within the kernel application, such as enabling/disabling logging to
|
||
|
the channel.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
Resources
|
||
|
=========
|
||
|
|
||
|
For news, example code, mailing list, etc. see the relay interface homepage:
|
||
|
|
||
|
http://relayfs.sourceforge.net
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
Credits
|
||
|
=======
|
||
|
|
||
|
The ideas and specs for the relay interface came about as a result of
|
||
|
discussions on tracing involving the following:
|
||
|
|
||
|
Michel Dagenais <michel.dagenais@polymtl.ca>
|
||
|
Richard Moore <richardj_moore@uk.ibm.com>
|
||
|
Bob Wisniewski <bob@watson.ibm.com>
|
||
|
Karim Yaghmour <karim@opersys.com>
|
||
|
Tom Zanussi <zanussi@us.ibm.com>
|
||
|
|
||
|
Also thanks to Hubertus Franke for a lot of useful suggestions and bug
|
||
|
reports.
|