22 lines
552 B
Plaintext
22 lines
552 B
Plaintext
|
My suggestion: Compare to normal parameters.
|
||
|
|
This means you get two lists of AUC scores
|
||
|
|
Your params: [0.80,0.75,0.73,....,0.95]
|
||
|
|
Pyod params: [0.82,0.71,0.48,....,0.95]
|
||
|
|
look at two values
|
||
|
|
$\sum_i your_i-pyod_i$
|
||
|
|
<l2st>
|
||
|
|
Total improvment. If positive, then your parameters help;)
|
||
|
|
But hard to see if this is significant
|
||
|
|
</l2st>
|
||
|
|
Fraction of $your_i>pyod_i$
|
||
|
|
<l2st>
|
||
|
|
Quantised, so does not care about improving your parameters further
|
||
|
|
But easy to see if this is significant
|
||
|
|
<l3st>
|
||
|
|
0.5->Probably just random
|
||
|
|
0.9->Probably quite significant
|
||
|
|
</l3st>
|
||
|
|
</l2st>
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|