99 lines
2.3 KiB
C++
99 lines
2.3 KiB
C++
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -verify %s
|
|
|
|
namespace test0 {
|
|
struct A {
|
|
static int x;
|
|
};
|
|
struct B : A {};
|
|
struct C : B {};
|
|
|
|
int test() {
|
|
return A::x
|
|
+ B::x
|
|
+ C::x;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
namespace test1 {
|
|
struct A {
|
|
private: static int x; // expected-note 5 {{declared private here}}
|
|
static int test() { return x; }
|
|
};
|
|
struct B : public A {
|
|
static int test() { return x; } // expected-error {{private member}}
|
|
};
|
|
struct C : private A {
|
|
static int test() { return x; } // expected-error {{private member}}
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
struct D {
|
|
public: static int x; // expected-note{{member is declared here}}
|
|
static int test() { return x; }
|
|
};
|
|
struct E : private D { // expected-note{{constrained by private inheritance}}
|
|
static int test() { return x; }
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
int test() {
|
|
return A::x // expected-error {{private member}}
|
|
+ B::x // expected-error {{private member}}
|
|
+ C::x // expected-error {{private member}}
|
|
+ D::x
|
|
+ E::x; // expected-error {{private member}}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
namespace test2 {
|
|
class A {
|
|
protected: static int x; // expected-note{{member is declared here}}
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
class B : private A {}; // expected-note {{private inheritance}}
|
|
class C : private A {
|
|
int test(B *b) {
|
|
return b->x; // expected-error {{private member}}
|
|
}
|
|
};
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
namespace test3 {
|
|
class A {
|
|
protected: static int x;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
class B : public A {};
|
|
class C : private A {
|
|
int test(B *b) {
|
|
// x is accessible at C when named in A.
|
|
// A is an accessible base of B at C.
|
|
// Therefore this succeeds.
|
|
return b->x;
|
|
}
|
|
};
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Don't crash. <rdar://12926092>
|
|
// Note that 'field' is indeed a private member of X but that access
|
|
// is indeed ultimately constrained by the protected inheritance from Y.
|
|
// If someone wants to put the effort into improving this diagnostic,
|
|
// they can feel free; even explaining it in person would be a pain.
|
|
namespace test4 {
|
|
class Z;
|
|
class X {
|
|
public:
|
|
void f(Z *p);
|
|
|
|
private:
|
|
int field; // expected-note {{member is declared here}}
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
class Y : public X { };
|
|
class Z : protected Y { }; // expected-note {{constrained by protected inheritance here}}
|
|
|
|
void X::f(Z *p) {
|
|
p->field = 0; // expected-error {{'field' is a private member of 'test4::X'}}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TODO: flesh out these cases
|