llvm-for-llvmta/tools/clang/test/Analysis/std-c-library-functions-res...

26 lines
1.1 KiB
C++
Raw Normal View History

2022-04-25 13:02:35 +02:00
// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1 %s \
// RUN: -analyzer-checker=core \
// RUN: -analyzer-checker=apiModeling.StdCLibraryFunctions \
// RUN: -analyzer-checker=debug.StdCLibraryFunctionsTester \
// RUN: -analyzer-config apiModeling.StdCLibraryFunctions:DisplayLoadedSummaries=true \
// RUN: -triple i686-unknown-linux 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
// The signatures for these functions are the same and they specify their
// parameter with the restrict qualifier. In C++, however, we are more
// indulgent and we do not match based on this qualifier. Thus, the given
// signature should match for both of the declarations below, i.e the summary
// should be loaded for both of them.
void __test_restrict_param_0(void *p);
void __test_restrict_param_1(void *__restrict p);
// The below declaration is illegal, "restrict" is not a keyword in C++.
// void __test_restrict_param_2(void *restrict p);
// CHECK: Loaded summary for: void __test_restrict_param_0(void *p)
// CHECK: Loaded summary for: void __test_restrict_param_1(void *__restrict p)
// Must have at least one call expression to initialize the summary map.
int bar(void);
void foo() {
bar();
}