llvm-for-llvmta/tools/clang/test/Analysis/additive-folding.cpp

217 lines
6.1 KiB
C++
Raw Normal View History

2022-04-25 13:02:35 +02:00
// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1 -analyzer-checker=core,debug.ExprInspection -verify -Wno-tautological-compare -analyzer-config eagerly-assume=false %s
void clang_analyzer_eval(bool);
#define UINT_MAX (~0U)
#define INT_MAX (UINT_MAX & (UINT_MAX >> 1))
#define INT_MIN (-INT_MAX - 1)
//---------------
// Plus/minus
//---------------
void separateExpressions (int a) {
int b = a + 1;
--b;
clang_analyzer_eval(a != 0 && b == 0); // expected-warning{{FALSE}}
}
void oneLongExpression (int a) {
// Expression canonicalization should still allow this to work, even though
// the first term is on the left.
int b = 15 + a + 15 - 10 - 20;
clang_analyzer_eval(a != 0 && b == 0); // expected-warning{{FALSE}}
}
void mixedTypes (int a) {
// Different additive types should not cause crashes when constant-folding.
// This is part of PR7406.
int b = a + 1LL;
clang_analyzer_eval(a != 0 && (b-1) == 0); // not crash, expected-warning{{FALSE}}
int c = a + 1U;
clang_analyzer_eval(a != 0 && (c-1) == 0); // not crash, expected-warning{{FALSE}}
}
//---------------
// Comparisons
//---------------
// Equality and inequality only
void eq_ne (unsigned a) {
if (a == UINT_MAX) {
clang_analyzer_eval(a+1 == 0); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
clang_analyzer_eval(a-1 == UINT_MAX-1); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
} else {
clang_analyzer_eval(a+1 != 0); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
clang_analyzer_eval(a-1 != UINT_MAX-1); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
}
}
// Mixed typed inequalities (part of PR7406)
// These should not crash.
void mixed_eq_ne (int a) {
if (a == 1) {
clang_analyzer_eval(a+1U == 2); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
clang_analyzer_eval(a-1U == 0); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
} else {
clang_analyzer_eval(a+1U != 2); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
clang_analyzer_eval(a-1U != 0); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
}
}
// Simple order comparisons with no adjustment
void baselineGT (unsigned a) {
if (a > 0)
clang_analyzer_eval(a != 0); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
else
clang_analyzer_eval(a == 0); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
}
void baselineGE (unsigned a) {
if (a >= UINT_MAX)
clang_analyzer_eval(a == UINT_MAX); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
else
clang_analyzer_eval(a != UINT_MAX); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
}
void baselineLT (unsigned a) {
if (a < UINT_MAX)
clang_analyzer_eval(a != UINT_MAX); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
else
clang_analyzer_eval(a == UINT_MAX); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
}
void baselineLE (unsigned a) {
if (a <= 0)
clang_analyzer_eval(a == 0); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
else
clang_analyzer_eval(a != 0); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
}
// Adjustment gives each of these an extra solution!
void adjustedGT (unsigned a) {
clang_analyzer_eval(a-1 > UINT_MAX-1); // expected-warning{{UNKNOWN}}
}
void adjustedGE (unsigned a) {
clang_analyzer_eval(a-1 > UINT_MAX-1); // expected-warning{{UNKNOWN}}
if (a-1 >= UINT_MAX-1)
clang_analyzer_eval(a == UINT_MAX); // expected-warning{{UNKNOWN}}
}
void adjustedLT (unsigned a) {
clang_analyzer_eval(a+1 < 1); // expected-warning{{UNKNOWN}}
}
void adjustedLE (unsigned a) {
clang_analyzer_eval(a+1 <= 1); // expected-warning{{UNKNOWN}}
if (a+1 <= 1)
clang_analyzer_eval(a == 0); // expected-warning{{UNKNOWN}}
}
// Tautologies
// The negative forms are exercised as well
// because clang_analyzer_eval tests both possibilities.
void tautologies(unsigned a) {
clang_analyzer_eval(a <= UINT_MAX); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
clang_analyzer_eval(a >= 0); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
}
// Tautologies from outside the range of the symbol
void tautologiesOutside(unsigned char a) {
clang_analyzer_eval(a <= 0x100); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
clang_analyzer_eval(a < 0x100); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
clang_analyzer_eval(a != 0x100); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
clang_analyzer_eval(a != -1); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
clang_analyzer_eval(a > -1); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
clang_analyzer_eval(a >= -1); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
}
// Wraparound with mixed types. Note that the analyzer assumes
// -fwrapv semantics.
void mixedWraparoundSanityCheck(int a) {
int max = INT_MAX;
int min = INT_MIN;
int b = a + 1;
clang_analyzer_eval(a == max && b != min); // expected-warning{{FALSE}}
}
void mixedWraparoundLE_GT(int a) {
int max = INT_MAX;
int min = INT_MIN;
clang_analyzer_eval((a + 2) <= (max + 1LL)); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
clang_analyzer_eval((a - 2) > (min - 1LL)); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
clang_analyzer_eval((a + 2LL) <= max); // expected-warning{{UNKNOWN}}
}
void mixedWraparoundGE_LT(int a) {
int max = INT_MAX;
int min = INT_MIN;
clang_analyzer_eval((a + 2) < (max + 1LL)); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
clang_analyzer_eval((a - 2) >= (min - 1LL)); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
clang_analyzer_eval((a - 2LL) >= min); // expected-warning{{UNKNOWN}}
}
void mixedWraparoundEQ_NE(int a) {
int max = INT_MAX;
clang_analyzer_eval((a + 2) != (max + 1LL)); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
clang_analyzer_eval((a + 2LL) == (max + 1LL)); // expected-warning{{UNKNOWN}}
}
// Mixed-signedness comparisons.
void mixedSignedness(int a, unsigned b) {
int sMin = INT_MIN;
unsigned uMin = INT_MIN;
clang_analyzer_eval(a == sMin && a != uMin); // expected-warning{{FALSE}}
clang_analyzer_eval(b == uMin && b != sMin); // expected-warning{{FALSE}}
}
void mixedSignedness2(int a) {
if (a != -1)
return;
clang_analyzer_eval(a == UINT_MAX); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
}
void mixedSignedness3(unsigned a) {
if (a != UINT_MAX)
return;
clang_analyzer_eval(a == -1); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
}
void multiplicativeSanityTest(int x) {
// At one point we were ignoring the *4 completely -- the constraint manager
// would see x < 8 and then declare the assertion to be known false.
if (x*4 < 8)
return;
clang_analyzer_eval(x == 3); // expected-warning{{UNKNOWN}}
}
void additiveSymSymFolding(int x, int y) {
// We should simplify 'x - 1' to '0' and handle the comparison,
// despite both sides being complicated symbols.
int z = x - 1;
if (x == 1)
if (y >= 0)
clang_analyzer_eval(z <= y); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
}