33 lines
1.4 KiB
C++
33 lines
1.4 KiB
C++
|
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++11 -fexceptions -fcxx-exceptions -fsyntax-only -verify %s
|
||
|
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -DUSE -std=c++11 -fexceptions -fcxx-exceptions -fsyntax-only -verify %s
|
||
|
|
||
|
// Maybe force the implicit declaration of 'operator delete' and 'operator
|
||
|
// delete[]'. This should make no difference to anything!
|
||
|
#ifdef USE
|
||
|
void f(int *p) {
|
||
|
delete p;
|
||
|
delete [] p;
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
#endif
|
||
|
|
||
|
// Deallocation functions are implicitly noexcept.
|
||
|
// Thus, explicit specs aren't allowed to conflict.
|
||
|
|
||
|
void operator delete(void*); // expected-warning {{function previously declared with an explicit exception specification redeclared with an implicit exception specification}}
|
||
|
void operator delete[](void*); // expected-warning {{function previously declared with an explicit exception specification redeclared with an implicit exception specification}}
|
||
|
|
||
|
static_assert(noexcept(operator delete(0)), "");
|
||
|
static_assert(noexcept(operator delete[](0)), "");
|
||
|
|
||
|
// Same goes for explicit declarations.
|
||
|
void operator delete(void*, float);
|
||
|
void operator delete[](void*, float);
|
||
|
|
||
|
static_assert(noexcept(operator delete(0, 0.f)), "");
|
||
|
static_assert(noexcept(operator delete[](0, 0.f)), "");
|
||
|
|
||
|
// But explicit specs stay.
|
||
|
void operator delete(void*, double) throw(int); // expected-note {{previous}}
|
||
|
static_assert(!noexcept(operator delete(0, 0.)), "");
|
||
|
void operator delete(void*, double) noexcept; // expected-error {{does not match}}
|