52527c462f
this is binutils issue 23825, but it's caused by gcc using local-exec model rather than initial-exec model with the intent of making binutils generate copy relocations. this is harmful, unnecessary, and not presently supported by musl (and probably should never be). patch taken from https://github.com/riscv/riscv-gcc/pull/118. |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| binutils-2.25.1 | ||
| binutils-2.27 | ||
| binutils-2.32 | ||
| binutils-397a64b3 | ||
| gcc-4.2.1 | ||
| gcc-5.3.0 | ||
| gcc-6.4.0 | ||
| gcc-6.5.0 | ||
| gcc-7.2.0 | ||
| gcc-7.3.0 | ||
| gcc-8.3.0 | ||
| gcc-9.2.0 | ||
| linux-4.4.10 | ||