musl-cross-make/patches/gcc-6.5.0/0017-c++-abi-break.diff

44 lines
1.7 KiB
Diff
Raw Permalink Normal View History

From https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87822
Author: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com>
Date: Wed Oct 31 13:03:25 2018 +0000
PR libstdc++/87822 fix layout change for nested std::pair
The introduction of the empty __pair_base base class for PR 86751
changed the layout of std::pair<std::pair<...>, ...>. The outer pair and
its first member both have a base class of the same type, which cannot
exist at the same address. This causes the first member to be at a
non-zero offset.
The solution is to make the base class depend on the template
parameters, so that each pair type has a different base class type,
which allows the base classes of the outer pair and its first member to
have the same address.
PR libstdc++/87822
* include/bits/stl_pair.h (__pair_base): Change to class template.
(pair): Make base class type depend on template parameters.
diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/stl_pair.h b/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/stl_pair.h
index a30b630b4fd..5a4823ab018 100644
--- a/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/stl_pair.h
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/stl_pair.h
@@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
};
#endif // C++11
- class __pair_base
+ template<typename _U1, typename _U2> class __pair_base
{
#if __cplusplus >= 201103L
template<typename _T1, typename _T2> friend struct pair;
@@ -202,7 +202,7 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
*/
template<typename _T1, typename _T2>
struct pair
- : private __pair_base
+ : private __pair_base<_T1, _T2>
{
typedef _T1 first_type; /// @c first_type is the first bound type
typedef _T2 second_type; /// @c second_type is the second bound type