commit 0e881c0a4b6146b7e856735226208f48251facd8 upstream.
The variable phba->fcf.fcf_flag is often protected by the lock
phba->hbalock() when is accessed. Here is an example in
lpfc_unregister_fcf_rescan():
spin_lock_irq(&phba->hbalock);
phba->fcf.fcf_flag |= FCF_INIT_DISC;
spin_unlock_irq(&phba->hbalock);
However, in the same function, phba->fcf.fcf_flag is assigned with 0
without holding the lock, and thus can cause a data race:
phba->fcf.fcf_flag = 0;
To fix this possible data race, a lock and unlock pair is added when
accessing the variable phba->fcf.fcf_flag.
Reported-by: BassCheck <bass@buaa.edu.cn>
Signed-off-by: Tuo Li <islituo@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230630024748.1035993-1-islituo@gmail.com
Reviewed-by: Justin Tee <justin.tee@broadcom.com>
Reviewed-by: Laurence Oberman <loberman@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenshan Lan <jetlan9@163.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
30652c8ceb