Commit Graph

705 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Filipe Manana
6ba4663ada btrfs: fix use-after-free when attempting to join an aborted transaction
[ Upstream commit e2f0943cf37305dbdeaf9846e3c941451bcdef63 ]

When we are trying to join the current transaction and if it's aborted,
we read its 'aborted' field after unlocking fs_info->trans_lock and
without holding any extra reference count on it. This means that a
concurrent task that is aborting the transaction may free the transaction
before we read its 'aborted' field, leading to a use-after-free.

Fix this by reading the 'aborted' field while holding fs_info->trans_lock
since any freeing task must first acquire that lock and set
fs_info->running_transaction to NULL before freeing the transaction.

This was reported by syzbot and Dmitry with the following stack traces
from KASAN:

   ==================================================================
   BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in join_transaction+0xd9b/0xda0 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:278
   Read of size 4 at addr ffff888011839024 by task kworker/u4:9/1128

   CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 1128 Comm: kworker/u4:9 Not tainted 6.13.0-rc7-syzkaller-00019-gc45323b7560e #0
   Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2~bpo12+1 04/01/2014
   Workqueue: events_unbound btrfs_async_reclaim_data_space
   Call Trace:
    <TASK>
    __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline]
    dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:120
    print_address_description mm/kasan/report.c:378 [inline]
    print_report+0x169/0x550 mm/kasan/report.c:489
    kasan_report+0x143/0x180 mm/kasan/report.c:602
    join_transaction+0xd9b/0xda0 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:278
    start_transaction+0xaf8/0x1670 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:697
    flush_space+0x448/0xcf0 fs/btrfs/space-info.c:803
    btrfs_async_reclaim_data_space+0x159/0x510 fs/btrfs/space-info.c:1321
    process_one_work kernel/workqueue.c:3236 [inline]
    process_scheduled_works+0xa66/0x1840 kernel/workqueue.c:3317
    worker_thread+0x870/0xd30 kernel/workqueue.c:3398
    kthread+0x2f0/0x390 kernel/kthread.c:389
    ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147
    ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244
    </TASK>

   Allocated by task 5315:
    kasan_save_stack mm/kasan/common.c:47 [inline]
    kasan_save_track+0x3f/0x80 mm/kasan/common.c:68
    poison_kmalloc_redzone mm/kasan/common.c:377 [inline]
    __kasan_kmalloc+0x98/0xb0 mm/kasan/common.c:394
    kasan_kmalloc include/linux/kasan.h:260 [inline]
    __kmalloc_cache_noprof+0x243/0x390 mm/slub.c:4329
    kmalloc_noprof include/linux/slab.h:901 [inline]
    join_transaction+0x144/0xda0 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:308
    start_transaction+0xaf8/0x1670 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:697
    btrfs_create_common+0x1b2/0x2e0 fs/btrfs/inode.c:6572
    lookup_open fs/namei.c:3649 [inline]
    open_last_lookups fs/namei.c:3748 [inline]
    path_openat+0x1c03/0x3590 fs/namei.c:3984
    do_filp_open+0x27f/0x4e0 fs/namei.c:4014
    do_sys_openat2+0x13e/0x1d0 fs/open.c:1402
    do_sys_open fs/open.c:1417 [inline]
    __do_sys_creat fs/open.c:1495 [inline]
    __se_sys_creat fs/open.c:1489 [inline]
    __x64_sys_creat+0x123/0x170 fs/open.c:1489
    do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
    do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
    entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f

   Freed by task 5336:
    kasan_save_stack mm/kasan/common.c:47 [inline]
    kasan_save_track+0x3f/0x80 mm/kasan/common.c:68
    kasan_save_free_info+0x40/0x50 mm/kasan/generic.c:582
    poison_slab_object mm/kasan/common.c:247 [inline]
    __kasan_slab_free+0x59/0x70 mm/kasan/common.c:264
    kasan_slab_free include/linux/kasan.h:233 [inline]
    slab_free_hook mm/slub.c:2353 [inline]
    slab_free mm/slub.c:4613 [inline]
    kfree+0x196/0x430 mm/slub.c:4761
    cleanup_transaction fs/btrfs/transaction.c:2063 [inline]
    btrfs_commit_transaction+0x2c97/0x3720 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:2598
    insert_balance_item+0x1284/0x20b0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3757
    btrfs_balance+0x992/0x10c0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4633
    btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x493/0x7c0 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:3670
    vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
    __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:906 [inline]
    __se_sys_ioctl+0xf5/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:892
    do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
    do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
    entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f

   The buggy address belongs to the object at ffff888011839000
    which belongs to the cache kmalloc-2k of size 2048
   The buggy address is located 36 bytes inside of
    freed 2048-byte region [ffff888011839000, ffff888011839800)

   The buggy address belongs to the physical page:
   page: refcount:1 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x0 pfn:0x11838
   head: order:3 mapcount:0 entire_mapcount:0 nr_pages_mapped:0 pincount:0
   flags: 0xfff00000000040(head|node=0|zone=1|lastcpupid=0x7ff)
   page_type: f5(slab)
   raw: 00fff00000000040 ffff88801ac42000 ffffea0000493400 dead000000000002
   raw: 0000000000000000 0000000000080008 00000001f5000000 0000000000000000
   head: 00fff00000000040 ffff88801ac42000 ffffea0000493400 dead000000000002
   head: 0000000000000000 0000000000080008 00000001f5000000 0000000000000000
   head: 00fff00000000003 ffffea0000460e01 ffffffffffffffff 0000000000000000
   head: 0000000000000008 0000000000000000 00000000ffffffff 0000000000000000
   page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected
   page_owner tracks the page as allocated
   page last allocated via order 3, migratetype Unmovable, gfp_mask 0xd20c0(__GFP_IO|__GFP_FS|__GFP_NOWARN|__GFP_NORETRY|__GFP_COMP|__GFP_NOMEMALLOC), pid 57, tgid 57 (kworker/0:2), ts 67248182943, free_ts 67229742023
    set_page_owner include/linux/page_owner.h:32 [inline]
    post_alloc_hook+0x1f3/0x230 mm/page_alloc.c:1558
    prep_new_page mm/page_alloc.c:1566 [inline]
    get_page_from_freelist+0x365c/0x37a0 mm/page_alloc.c:3476
    __alloc_pages_noprof+0x292/0x710 mm/page_alloc.c:4753
    alloc_pages_mpol_noprof+0x3e1/0x780 mm/mempolicy.c:2269
    alloc_slab_page+0x6a/0x110 mm/slub.c:2423
    allocate_slab+0x5a/0x2b0 mm/slub.c:2589
    new_slab mm/slub.c:2642 [inline]
    ___slab_alloc+0xc27/0x14a0 mm/slub.c:3830
    __slab_alloc+0x58/0xa0 mm/slub.c:3920
    __slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3995 [inline]
    slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:4156 [inline]
    __do_kmalloc_node mm/slub.c:4297 [inline]
    __kmalloc_node_track_caller_noprof+0x2e9/0x4c0 mm/slub.c:4317
    kmalloc_reserve+0x111/0x2a0 net/core/skbuff.c:609
    __alloc_skb+0x1f3/0x440 net/core/skbuff.c:678
    alloc_skb include/linux/skbuff.h:1323 [inline]
    alloc_skb_with_frags+0xc3/0x820 net/core/skbuff.c:6612
    sock_alloc_send_pskb+0x91a/0xa60 net/core/sock.c:2884
    sock_alloc_send_skb include/net/sock.h:1803 [inline]
    mld_newpack+0x1c3/0xaf0 net/ipv6/mcast.c:1747
    add_grhead net/ipv6/mcast.c:1850 [inline]
    add_grec+0x1492/0x19a0 net/ipv6/mcast.c:1988
    mld_send_cr net/ipv6/mcast.c:2114 [inline]
    mld_ifc_work+0x691/0xd90 net/ipv6/mcast.c:2651
   page last free pid 5300 tgid 5300 stack trace:
    reset_page_owner include/linux/page_owner.h:25 [inline]
    free_pages_prepare mm/page_alloc.c:1127 [inline]
    free_unref_page+0xd3f/0x1010 mm/page_alloc.c:2659
    __slab_free+0x2c2/0x380 mm/slub.c:4524
    qlink_free mm/kasan/quarantine.c:163 [inline]
    qlist_free_all+0x9a/0x140 mm/kasan/quarantine.c:179
    kasan_quarantine_reduce+0x14f/0x170 mm/kasan/quarantine.c:286
    __kasan_slab_alloc+0x23/0x80 mm/kasan/common.c:329
    kasan_slab_alloc include/linux/kasan.h:250 [inline]
    slab_post_alloc_hook mm/slub.c:4119 [inline]
    slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:4168 [inline]
    __do_kmalloc_node mm/slub.c:4297 [inline]
    __kmalloc_noprof+0x236/0x4c0 mm/slub.c:4310
    kmalloc_noprof include/linux/slab.h:905 [inline]
    kzalloc_noprof include/linux/slab.h:1037 [inline]
    fib_create_info+0xc14/0x25b0 net/ipv4/fib_semantics.c:1435
    fib_table_insert+0x1f6/0x1f20 net/ipv4/fib_trie.c:1231
    fib_magic+0x3d8/0x620 net/ipv4/fib_frontend.c:1112
    fib_add_ifaddr+0x40c/0x5e0 net/ipv4/fib_frontend.c:1156
    fib_netdev_event+0x375/0x490 net/ipv4/fib_frontend.c:1494
    notifier_call_chain+0x1a5/0x3f0 kernel/notifier.c:85
    __dev_notify_flags+0x207/0x400
    dev_change_flags+0xf0/0x1a0 net/core/dev.c:9045
    do_setlink+0xc90/0x4210 net/core/rtnetlink.c:3109
    rtnl_changelink net/core/rtnetlink.c:3723 [inline]
    __rtnl_newlink net/core/rtnetlink.c:3875 [inline]
    rtnl_newlink+0x1bb6/0x2210 net/core/rtnetlink.c:4012

   Memory state around the buggy address:
    ffff888011838f00: fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc
    ffff888011838f80: fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc
   >ffff888011839000: fa fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb
                                  ^
    ffff888011839080: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb
    ffff888011839100: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb
   ==================================================================

Reported-by: syzbot+45212e9d87a98c3f5b42@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/678e7da5.050a0220.303755.007c.GAE@google.com/
Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CACT4Y+ZFBdo7pT8L2AzM=vegZwjp-wNkVJZQf0Ta3vZqtExaSw@mail.gmail.com/
Fixes: 871383be59 ("btrfs: add missing unlocks to transaction abort paths")
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2025-02-21 13:49:29 +01:00
Filipe Manana
588df4829d btrfs: do not BUG_ON on failure to get dir index for new snapshot
commit df9f278239046719c91aeb59ec0afb1a99ee8b2b upstream.

During the transaction commit path, at create_pending_snapshot(), there
is no need to BUG_ON() in case we fail to get a dir index for the snapshot
in the parent directory. This should fail very rarely because the parent
inode should be loaded in memory already, with the respective delayed
inode created and the parent inode's index_cnt field already initialized.

However if it fails, it may be -ENOMEM like the comment at
create_pending_snapshot() says or any error returned by
btrfs_search_slot() through btrfs_set_inode_index_count(), which can be
pretty much anything such as -EIO or -EUCLEAN for example. So the comment
is not correct when it says it can only be -ENOMEM.

However doing a BUG_ON() here is overkill, since we can instead abort
the transaction and return the error. Note that any error returned by
create_pending_snapshot() will eventually result in a transaction
abort at cleanup_transaction(), called from btrfs_commit_transaction(),
but we can explicitly abort the transaction at this point instead so that
we get a stack trace to tell us that the call to btrfs_set_inode_index()
failed.

So just abort the transaction and return in case btrfs_set_inode_index()
returned an error at create_pending_snapshot().

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sergio González Collado <sergio.collado@gmail.com>
Reported-by: syzbot+c56033c8c15c08286062@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2024-07-27 11:32:19 +02:00
Boris Burkov
e04539f513 btrfs: always clear PERTRANS metadata during commit
[ Upstream commit 6e68de0bb0ed59e0554a0c15ede7308c47351e2d ]

It is possible to clear a root's IN_TRANS tag from the radix tree, but
not clear its PERTRANS, if there is some error in between. Eliminate
that possibility by moving the free up to where we clear the tag.

Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2024-05-17 11:56:06 +02:00
Boris Burkov
c00146b399 btrfs: qgroup: convert PREALLOC to PERTRANS after record_root_in_trans
commit 211de93367304ab395357f8cb12568a4d1e20701 upstream.

The transaction is only able to free PERTRANS reservations for a root
once that root has been recorded with the TRANS tag on the roots radix
tree. Therefore, until we are sure that this root will get tagged, it
isn't safe to convert. Generally, this is not an issue as *some*
transaction will likely tag the root before long and this reservation
will get freed in that transaction, but technically it could stick
around until unmount and result in a warning about leaked metadata
reservation space.

This path is most exercised by running the generic/269 fstest with
CONFIG_BTRFS_DEBUG.

Fixes: a6496849671a ("btrfs: fix start transaction qgroup rsv double free")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.6+
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2024-04-17 11:18:26 +02:00
Filipe Manana
c34adc20b9 btrfs: fix double free of anonymous device after snapshot creation failure
commit e2b54eaf28df0c978626c9736b94f003b523b451 upstream.

When creating a snapshot we may do a double free of an anonymous device
in case there's an error committing the transaction. The second free may
result in freeing an anonymous device number that was allocated by some
other subsystem in the kernel or another btrfs filesystem.

The steps that lead to this:

1) At ioctl.c:create_snapshot() we allocate an anonymous device number
   and assign it to pending_snapshot->anon_dev;

2) Then we call btrfs_commit_transaction() and end up at
   transaction.c:create_pending_snapshot();

3) There we call btrfs_get_new_fs_root() and pass it the anonymous device
   number stored in pending_snapshot->anon_dev;

4) btrfs_get_new_fs_root() frees that anonymous device number because
   btrfs_lookup_fs_root() returned a root - someone else did a lookup
   of the new root already, which could some task doing backref walking;

5) After that some error happens in the transaction commit path, and at
   ioctl.c:create_snapshot() we jump to the 'fail' label, and after
   that we free again the same anonymous device number, which in the
   meanwhile may have been reallocated somewhere else, because
   pending_snapshot->anon_dev still has the same value as in step 1.

Recently syzbot ran into this and reported the following trace:

  ------------[ cut here ]------------
  ida_free called for id=51 which is not allocated.
  WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 31038 at lib/idr.c:525 ida_free+0x370/0x420 lib/idr.c:525
  Modules linked in:
  CPU: 1 PID: 31038 Comm: syz-executor.2 Not tainted 6.8.0-rc4-syzkaller-00410-gc02197fc9076 #0
  Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/25/2024
  RIP: 0010:ida_free+0x370/0x420 lib/idr.c:525
  Code: 10 42 80 3c 28 (...)
  RSP: 0018:ffffc90015a67300 EFLAGS: 00010246
  RAX: be5130472f5dd000 RBX: 0000000000000033 RCX: 0000000000040000
  RDX: ffffc90009a7a000 RSI: 000000000003ffff RDI: 0000000000040000
  RBP: ffffc90015a673f0 R08: ffffffff81577992 R09: 1ffff92002b4cdb4
  R10: dffffc0000000000 R11: fffff52002b4cdb5 R12: 0000000000000246
  R13: dffffc0000000000 R14: ffffffff8e256b80 R15: 0000000000000246
  FS:  00007fca3f4b46c0(0000) GS:ffff8880b9500000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
  CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
  CR2: 00007f167a17b978 CR3: 000000001ed26000 CR4: 0000000000350ef0
  Call Trace:
   <TASK>
   btrfs_get_root_ref+0xa48/0xaf0 fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:1346
   create_pending_snapshot+0xff2/0x2bc0 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:1837
   create_pending_snapshots+0x195/0x1d0 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:1931
   btrfs_commit_transaction+0xf1c/0x3740 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:2404
   create_snapshot+0x507/0x880 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:848
   btrfs_mksubvol+0x5d0/0x750 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:998
   btrfs_mksnapshot+0xb5/0xf0 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:1044
   __btrfs_ioctl_snap_create+0x387/0x4b0 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:1306
   btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_v2+0x1ca/0x400 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:1393
   btrfs_ioctl+0xa74/0xd40
   vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
   __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:871 [inline]
   __se_sys_ioctl+0xfe/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:857
   do_syscall_64+0xfb/0x240
   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6f/0x77
  RIP: 0033:0x7fca3e67dda9
  Code: 28 00 00 00 (...)
  RSP: 002b:00007fca3f4b40c8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
  RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007fca3e7abf80 RCX: 00007fca3e67dda9
  RDX: 00000000200005c0 RSI: 0000000050009417 RDI: 0000000000000003
  RBP: 00007fca3e6ca47a R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
  R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
  R13: 000000000000000b R14: 00007fca3e7abf80 R15: 00007fff6bf95658
   </TASK>

Where we get an explicit message where we attempt to free an anonymous
device number that is not currently allocated. It happens in a different
code path from the example below, at btrfs_get_root_ref(), so this change
may not fix the case triggered by syzbot.

To fix at least the code path from the example above, change
btrfs_get_root_ref() and its callers to receive a dev_t pointer argument
for the anonymous device number, so that in case it frees the number, it
also resets it to 0, so that up in the call chain we don't attempt to do
the double free.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10+
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/000000000000f673a1061202f630@google.com/
Fixes: e03ee2fe873e ("btrfs: do not ASSERT() if the newly created subvolume already got read")
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2024-03-06 14:45:10 +00:00
Filipe Manana
8a4e34fe1b btrfs: prevent transaction block reserve underflow when starting transaction
[ Upstream commit a7ddeeb079505961355cf0106154da0110f1fdff ]

When starting a transaction, with a non-zero number of items, we reserve
metadata space for that number of items and for delayed refs by doing a
call to btrfs_block_rsv_add(), with the transaction block reserve passed
as the block reserve argument. This reserves metadata space and adds it
to the transaction block reserve. Later we migrate the space we reserved
for delayed references from the transaction block reserve into the delayed
refs block reserve, by calling btrfs_migrate_to_delayed_refs_rsv().

btrfs_migrate_to_delayed_refs_rsv() decrements the number of bytes to
migrate from the source block reserve, and this however may result in an
underflow in case the space added to the transaction block reserve ended
up being used by another task that has not reserved enough space for its
own use - examples are tasks doing reflinks or hole punching because they
end up calling btrfs_replace_file_extents() -> btrfs_drop_extents() and
may need to modify/COW a variable number of leaves/paths, so they keep
trying to use space from the transaction block reserve when they need to
COW an extent buffer, and may end up trying to use more space then they
have reserved (1 unit/path only for removing file extent items).

This can be avoided by simply reserving space first without adding it to
the transaction block reserve, then add the space for delayed refs to the
delayed refs block reserve and finally add the remaining reserved space
to the transaction block reserve. This also makes the code a bit shorter
and simpler. So just do that.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-10-25 12:03:09 +02:00
Sweet Tea Dorminy
ef54db5b5d btrfs: use struct fscrypt_str instead of struct qstr
[ Upstream commit 6db75318823a169e836a478ca57d6a7c0a156b77 ]

While struct qstr is more natural without fscrypt, since it's provided
by dentries, struct fscrypt_str is provided by the fscrypt handlers
processing dentries, and is thus more natural in the fscrypt world.
Replace all of the struct qstr uses with struct fscrypt_str.

Signed-off-by: Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Stable-dep-of: 9af86694fd5d ("btrfs: file_remove_privs needs an exclusive lock in direct io write")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-10-10 22:00:36 +02:00
Sweet Tea Dorminy
68ad364ec8 btrfs: setup qstr from dentrys using fscrypt helper
[ Upstream commit ab3c5c18e8fa3f8ea116016095d25adab466cd39 ]

Most places where we get a struct qstr, we are doing so from a dentry.
With fscrypt, the dentry's name may be encrypted on-disk, so fscrypt
provides a helper to convert a dentry name to the appropriate disk name
if necessary. Convert each of the dentry name accesses to use
fscrypt_setup_filename(), then convert the resulting fscrypt_name back
to an unencrypted qstr. This does not work for nokey names, but the
specific locations that could spawn nokey names are noted.

At present, since there are no encrypted directories, nothing goes down
the filename encryption paths.

Signed-off-by: Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Stable-dep-of: 9af86694fd5d ("btrfs: file_remove_privs needs an exclusive lock in direct io write")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-10-10 22:00:36 +02:00
Sweet Tea Dorminy
1cf474cd47 btrfs: use struct qstr instead of name and namelen pairs
[ Upstream commit e43eec81c5167b655b72c781b0e75e62a05e415e ]

Many functions throughout btrfs take name buffer and name length
arguments. Most of these functions at the highest level are usually
called with these arguments extracted from a supplied dentry's name.
But the entire name can be passed instead, making each function a little
more elegant.

Each function whose arguments are currently the name and length
extracted from a dentry is herein converted to instead take a pointer to
the name in the dentry. The couple of calls to these calls without a
struct dentry are converted to create an appropriate qstr to pass in.
Additionally, every function which is only called with a name/len
extracted directly from a qstr is also converted.

This change has positive effect on stack consumption, frame of many
functions is reduced but this will be used in the future for fscrypt
related structures.

Signed-off-by: Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Stable-dep-of: 9af86694fd5d ("btrfs: file_remove_privs needs an exclusive lock in direct io write")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-10-10 22:00:36 +02:00
Filipe Manana
91f6a538d6 btrfs: don't start transaction when joining with TRANS_JOIN_NOSTART
commit 4490e803e1fe9fab8db5025e44e23b55df54078b upstream.

When joining a transaction with TRANS_JOIN_NOSTART, if we don't find a
running transaction we end up creating one. This goes against the purpose
of TRANS_JOIN_NOSTART which is to join a running transaction if its state
is at or below the state TRANS_STATE_COMMIT_START, otherwise return an
-ENOENT error and don't start a new transaction. So fix this to not create
a new transaction if there's no running transaction at or below that
state.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+
Fixes: a6d155d2e3 ("Btrfs: fix deadlock between fiemap and transaction commits")
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-09-19 12:28:06 +02:00
Boris Burkov
cdc3ba292d btrfs: fix start transaction qgroup rsv double free
commit a6496849671a5bc9218ecec25a983253b34351b1 upstream.

btrfs_start_transaction reserves metadata space of the PERTRANS type
before it identifies a transaction to start/join. This allows flushing
when reserving that space without a deadlock. However, it results in a
race which temporarily breaks qgroup rsv accounting.

T1                                              T2
start_transaction
do_stuff
                                            start_transaction
                                                qgroup_reserve_meta_pertrans
commit_transaction
    qgroup_free_meta_all_pertrans
                                            hit an error starting txn
                                            goto reserve_fail
                                            qgroup_free_meta_pertrans (already freed!)

The basic issue is that there is nothing preventing another commit from
committing before start_transaction finishes (in fact sometimes we
intentionally wait for it) so any error path that frees the reserve is
at risk of this race.

While this exact space was getting freed anyway, and it's not a huge
deal to double free it (just a warning, the free code catches this), it
can result in incorrectly freeing some other pertrans reservation in
this same reservation, which could then lead to spuriously granting
reservations we might not have the space for. Therefore, I do believe it
is worth fixing.

To fix it, use the existing prealloc->pertrans conversion mechanism.
When we first reserve the space, we reserve prealloc space and only when
we are sure we have a transaction do we convert it to pertrans. This way
any racing commits do not blow away our reservation, but we still get a
pertrans reservation that is freed when _this_ transaction gets committed.

This issue can be reproduced by running generic/269 with either qgroups
or squotas enabled via mkfs on the scratch device.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10+
Signed-off-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-09-19 12:28:05 +02:00
Filipe Manana
360c98f583 btrfs: check for commit error at btrfs_attach_transaction_barrier()
commit b28ff3a7d7e97456fd86b68d24caa32e1cfa7064 upstream.

btrfs_attach_transaction_barrier() is used to get a handle pointing to the
current running transaction if the transaction has not started its commit
yet (its state is < TRANS_STATE_COMMIT_START). If the transaction commit
has started, then we wait for the transaction to commit and finish before
returning - however we completely ignore if the transaction was aborted
due to some error during its commit, we simply return ERR_PT(-ENOENT),
which makes the caller assume everything is fine and no errors happened.

This could make an fsync return success (0) to user space when in fact we
had a transaction abort and the target inode changes were therefore not
persisted.

Fix this by checking for the return value from btrfs_wait_for_commit(),
and if it returned an error, return it back to the caller.

Fixes: d4edf39bd5 ("Btrfs: fix uncompleted transaction")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-08-03 10:24:13 +02:00
Filipe Manana
a7b85dc316 btrfs: check if the transaction was aborted at btrfs_wait_for_commit()
commit bf7ecbe9875061bf3fce1883e3b26b77f847d1e8 upstream.

At btrfs_wait_for_commit() we wait for a transaction to finish and then
always return 0 (success) without checking if it was aborted, in which
case the transaction didn't happen due to some critical error. Fix this
by checking if the transaction was aborted.

Fixes: 462045928b ("Btrfs: add START_SYNC, WAIT_SYNC ioctls")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-08-03 10:24:13 +02:00
Filipe Manana
6134a4bb6b btrfs: fix deadlock when aborting transaction during relocation with scrub
commit 2d82a40aa7d6fcae0250ec68b8566cdee7bfd44c upstream.

Before relocating a block group we pause scrub, then do the relocation and
then unpause scrub. The relocation process requires starting and committing
a transaction, and if we have a failure in the critical section of the
transaction commit path (transaction state >= TRANS_STATE_COMMIT_START),
we will deadlock if there is a paused scrub.

That results in stack traces like the following:

  [42.479] BTRFS info (device sdc): relocating block group 53876686848 flags metadata|raid6
  [42.936] BTRFS warning (device sdc): Skipping commit of aborted transaction.
  [42.936] ------------[ cut here ]------------
  [42.936] BTRFS: Transaction aborted (error -28)
  [42.936] WARNING: CPU: 11 PID: 346822 at fs/btrfs/transaction.c:1977 btrfs_commit_transaction+0xcc8/0xeb0 [btrfs]
  [42.936] Modules linked in: dm_flakey dm_mod loop btrfs (...)
  [42.936] CPU: 11 PID: 346822 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G        W          6.3.0-rc2-btrfs-next-127+ #1
  [42.936] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
  [42.936] RIP: 0010:btrfs_commit_transaction+0xcc8/0xeb0 [btrfs]
  [42.936] Code: ff ff 45 8b (...)
  [42.936] RSP: 0018:ffffb58649633b48 EFLAGS: 00010282
  [42.936] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff8be6ef4d5bd8 RCX: 0000000000000000
  [42.936] RDX: 0000000000000002 RSI: ffffffffb35e7782 RDI: 00000000ffffffff
  [42.936] RBP: ffff8be6ef4d5c98 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffffb586496339e8
  [42.936] R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff8be6d38c7c00
  [42.936] R13: 00000000ffffffe4 R14: ffff8be6c268c000 R15: ffff8be6ef4d5cf0
  [42.936] FS:  00007f381a82b340(0000) GS:ffff8beddfcc0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
  [42.936] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
  [42.936] CR2: 00007f1e35fb7638 CR3: 0000000117680006 CR4: 0000000000370ee0
  [42.936] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
  [42.936] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
  [42.936] Call Trace:
  [42.936]  <TASK>
  [42.936]  ? start_transaction+0xcb/0x610 [btrfs]
  [42.936]  prepare_to_relocate+0x111/0x1a0 [btrfs]
  [42.936]  relocate_block_group+0x57/0x5d0 [btrfs]
  [42.936]  ? btrfs_wait_nocow_writers+0x25/0xb0 [btrfs]
  [42.936]  btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x248/0x3c0 [btrfs]
  [42.936]  ? __pfx_autoremove_wake_function+0x10/0x10
  [42.936]  btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x3b/0x150 [btrfs]
  [42.936]  btrfs_balance+0x8ff/0x11d0 [btrfs]
  [42.936]  ? __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x14a/0x410
  [42.936]  btrfs_ioctl+0x2334/0x32c0 [btrfs]
  [42.937]  ? mod_objcg_state+0xd2/0x360
  [42.937]  ? refill_obj_stock+0xb0/0x160
  [42.937]  ? seq_release+0x25/0x30
  [42.937]  ? __rseq_handle_notify_resume+0x3b5/0x4b0
  [42.937]  ? percpu_counter_add_batch+0x2e/0xa0
  [42.937]  ? __x64_sys_ioctl+0x88/0xc0
  [42.937]  __x64_sys_ioctl+0x88/0xc0
  [42.937]  do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
  [42.937]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x72/0xdc
  [42.937] RIP: 0033:0x7f381a6ffe9b
  [42.937] Code: 00 48 89 44 24 (...)
  [42.937] RSP: 002b:00007ffd45ecf060 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
  [42.937] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000001 RCX: 00007f381a6ffe9b
  [42.937] RDX: 00007ffd45ecf150 RSI: 00000000c4009420 RDI: 0000000000000003
  [42.937] RBP: 0000000000000003 R08: 0000000000000013 R09: 0000000000000000
  [42.937] R10: 00007f381a60c878 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007ffd45ed0423
  [42.937] R13: 00007ffd45ecf150 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 00007ffd45ecf148
  [42.937]  </TASK>
  [42.937] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
  [42.937] BTRFS: error (device sdc: state A) in cleanup_transaction:1977: errno=-28 No space left
  [59.196] INFO: task btrfs:346772 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
  [59.196]       Tainted: G        W          6.3.0-rc2-btrfs-next-127+ #1
  [59.196] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
  [59.196] task:btrfs           state:D stack:0     pid:346772 ppid:1      flags:0x00004002
  [59.196] Call Trace:
  [59.196]  <TASK>
  [59.196]  __schedule+0x392/0xa70
  [59.196]  ? __pv_queued_spin_lock_slowpath+0x165/0x370
  [59.196]  schedule+0x5d/0xd0
  [59.196]  __scrub_blocked_if_needed+0x74/0xc0 [btrfs]
  [59.197]  ? __pfx_autoremove_wake_function+0x10/0x10
  [59.197]  scrub_pause_off+0x21/0x50 [btrfs]
  [59.197]  scrub_simple_mirror+0x1c7/0x950 [btrfs]
  [59.197]  ? scrub_parity_put+0x1a5/0x1d0 [btrfs]
  [59.198]  ? __pfx_autoremove_wake_function+0x10/0x10
  [59.198]  scrub_stripe+0x20d/0x740 [btrfs]
  [59.198]  scrub_chunk+0xc4/0x130 [btrfs]
  [59.198]  scrub_enumerate_chunks+0x3e4/0x7a0 [btrfs]
  [59.198]  ? __pfx_autoremove_wake_function+0x10/0x10
  [59.198]  btrfs_scrub_dev+0x236/0x6a0 [btrfs]
  [59.199]  ? btrfs_ioctl+0xd97/0x32c0 [btrfs]
  [59.199]  ? _copy_from_user+0x7b/0x80
  [59.199]  btrfs_ioctl+0xde1/0x32c0 [btrfs]
  [59.199]  ? refill_stock+0x33/0x50
  [59.199]  ? should_failslab+0xa/0x20
  [59.199]  ? kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x151/0x460
  [59.199]  ? alloc_io_context+0x1b/0x80
  [59.199]  ? preempt_count_add+0x70/0xa0
  [59.199]  ? __x64_sys_ioctl+0x88/0xc0
  [59.199]  __x64_sys_ioctl+0x88/0xc0
  [59.199]  do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
  [59.199]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x72/0xdc
  [59.199] RIP: 0033:0x7f82ffaffe9b
  [59.199] RSP: 002b:00007f82ff9fcc50 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
  [59.199] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000055b191e36310 RCX: 00007f82ffaffe9b
  [59.199] RDX: 000055b191e36310 RSI: 00000000c400941b RDI: 0000000000000003
  [59.199] RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 00007fff1575016f R09: 0000000000000000
  [59.199] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f82ff9fd640
  [59.199] R13: 000000000000006b R14: 00007f82ffa87580 R15: 0000000000000000
  [59.199]  </TASK>
  [59.199] INFO: task btrfs:346773 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
  [59.200]       Tainted: G        W          6.3.0-rc2-btrfs-next-127+ #1
  [59.200] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
  [59.201] task:btrfs           state:D stack:0     pid:346773 ppid:1      flags:0x00004002
  [59.201] Call Trace:
  [59.201]  <TASK>
  [59.201]  __schedule+0x392/0xa70
  [59.201]  ? __pv_queued_spin_lock_slowpath+0x165/0x370
  [59.201]  schedule+0x5d/0xd0
  [59.201]  __scrub_blocked_if_needed+0x74/0xc0 [btrfs]
  [59.201]  ? __pfx_autoremove_wake_function+0x10/0x10
  [59.201]  scrub_pause_off+0x21/0x50 [btrfs]
  [59.202]  scrub_simple_mirror+0x1c7/0x950 [btrfs]
  [59.202]  ? scrub_parity_put+0x1a5/0x1d0 [btrfs]
  [59.202]  ? __pfx_autoremove_wake_function+0x10/0x10
  [59.202]  scrub_stripe+0x20d/0x740 [btrfs]
  [59.202]  scrub_chunk+0xc4/0x130 [btrfs]
  [59.203]  scrub_enumerate_chunks+0x3e4/0x7a0 [btrfs]
  [59.203]  ? __pfx_autoremove_wake_function+0x10/0x10
  [59.203]  btrfs_scrub_dev+0x236/0x6a0 [btrfs]
  [59.203]  ? btrfs_ioctl+0xd97/0x32c0 [btrfs]
  [59.203]  ? _copy_from_user+0x7b/0x80
  [59.203]  btrfs_ioctl+0xde1/0x32c0 [btrfs]
  [59.204]  ? should_failslab+0xa/0x20
  [59.204]  ? kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x151/0x460
  [59.204]  ? alloc_io_context+0x1b/0x80
  [59.204]  ? preempt_count_add+0x70/0xa0
  [59.204]  ? __x64_sys_ioctl+0x88/0xc0
  [59.204]  __x64_sys_ioctl+0x88/0xc0
  [59.204]  do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
  [59.204]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x72/0xdc
  [59.204] RIP: 0033:0x7f82ffaffe9b
  [59.204] RSP: 002b:00007f82ff1fbc50 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
  [59.204] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000055b191e36790 RCX: 00007f82ffaffe9b
  [59.204] RDX: 000055b191e36790 RSI: 00000000c400941b RDI: 0000000000000003
  [59.204] RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 00007fff1575016f R09: 0000000000000000
  [59.204] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f82ff1fc640
  [59.204] R13: 000000000000006b R14: 00007f82ffa87580 R15: 0000000000000000
  [59.204]  </TASK>
  [59.204] INFO: task btrfs:346774 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
  [59.205]       Tainted: G        W          6.3.0-rc2-btrfs-next-127+ #1
  [59.205] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
  [59.206] task:btrfs           state:D stack:0     pid:346774 ppid:1      flags:0x00004002
  [59.206] Call Trace:
  [59.206]  <TASK>
  [59.206]  __schedule+0x392/0xa70
  [59.206]  schedule+0x5d/0xd0
  [59.206]  __scrub_blocked_if_needed+0x74/0xc0 [btrfs]
  [59.206]  ? __pfx_autoremove_wake_function+0x10/0x10
  [59.206]  scrub_pause_off+0x21/0x50 [btrfs]
  [59.207]  scrub_simple_mirror+0x1c7/0x950 [btrfs]
  [59.207]  ? scrub_parity_put+0x1a5/0x1d0 [btrfs]
  [59.207]  ? __pfx_autoremove_wake_function+0x10/0x10
  [59.207]  scrub_stripe+0x20d/0x740 [btrfs]
  [59.208]  scrub_chunk+0xc4/0x130 [btrfs]
  [59.208]  scrub_enumerate_chunks+0x3e4/0x7a0 [btrfs]
  [59.208]  ? __mutex_unlock_slowpath.isra.0+0x9a/0x120
  [59.208]  btrfs_scrub_dev+0x236/0x6a0 [btrfs]
  [59.208]  ? btrfs_ioctl+0xd97/0x32c0 [btrfs]
  [59.209]  ? _copy_from_user+0x7b/0x80
  [59.209]  btrfs_ioctl+0xde1/0x32c0 [btrfs]
  [59.209]  ? should_failslab+0xa/0x20
  [59.209]  ? kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x151/0x460
  [59.209]  ? alloc_io_context+0x1b/0x80
  [59.209]  ? preempt_count_add+0x70/0xa0
  [59.209]  ? __x64_sys_ioctl+0x88/0xc0
  [59.209]  __x64_sys_ioctl+0x88/0xc0
  [59.209]  do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
  [59.209]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x72/0xdc
  [59.209] RIP: 0033:0x7f82ffaffe9b
  [59.209] RSP: 002b:00007f82fe9fac50 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
  [59.209] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000055b191e36c10 RCX: 00007f82ffaffe9b
  [59.209] RDX: 000055b191e36c10 RSI: 00000000c400941b RDI: 0000000000000003
  [59.209] RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 00007fff1575016f R09: 0000000000000000
  [59.209] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f82fe9fb640
  [59.209] R13: 000000000000006b R14: 00007f82ffa87580 R15: 0000000000000000
  [59.209]  </TASK>
  [59.209] INFO: task btrfs:346775 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
  [59.210]       Tainted: G        W          6.3.0-rc2-btrfs-next-127+ #1
  [59.210] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
  [59.211] task:btrfs           state:D stack:0     pid:346775 ppid:1      flags:0x00004002
  [59.211] Call Trace:
  [59.211]  <TASK>
  [59.211]  __schedule+0x392/0xa70
  [59.211]  schedule+0x5d/0xd0
  [59.211]  __scrub_blocked_if_needed+0x74/0xc0 [btrfs]
  [59.211]  ? __pfx_autoremove_wake_function+0x10/0x10
  [59.211]  scrub_pause_off+0x21/0x50 [btrfs]
  [59.212]  scrub_simple_mirror+0x1c7/0x950 [btrfs]
  [59.212]  ? scrub_parity_put+0x1a5/0x1d0 [btrfs]
  [59.212]  ? __pfx_autoremove_wake_function+0x10/0x10
  [59.212]  scrub_stripe+0x20d/0x740 [btrfs]
  [59.213]  scrub_chunk+0xc4/0x130 [btrfs]
  [59.213]  scrub_enumerate_chunks+0x3e4/0x7a0 [btrfs]
  [59.213]  ? __mutex_unlock_slowpath.isra.0+0x9a/0x120
  [59.213]  btrfs_scrub_dev+0x236/0x6a0 [btrfs]
  [59.213]  ? btrfs_ioctl+0xd97/0x32c0 [btrfs]
  [59.214]  ? _copy_from_user+0x7b/0x80
  [59.214]  btrfs_ioctl+0xde1/0x32c0 [btrfs]
  [59.214]  ? should_failslab+0xa/0x20
  [59.214]  ? kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x151/0x460
  [59.214]  ? alloc_io_context+0x1b/0x80
  [59.214]  ? preempt_count_add+0x70/0xa0
  [59.214]  ? __x64_sys_ioctl+0x88/0xc0
  [59.214]  __x64_sys_ioctl+0x88/0xc0
  [59.214]  do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
  [59.214]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x72/0xdc
  [59.214] RIP: 0033:0x7f82ffaffe9b
  [59.214] RSP: 002b:00007f82fe1f9c50 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
  [59.214] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000055b191e37090 RCX: 00007f82ffaffe9b
  [59.214] RDX: 000055b191e37090 RSI: 00000000c400941b RDI: 0000000000000003
  [59.214] RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 00007fff1575016f R09: 0000000000000000
  [59.214] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f82fe1fa640
  [59.214] R13: 000000000000006b R14: 00007f82ffa87580 R15: 0000000000000000
  [59.214]  </TASK>
  [59.214] INFO: task btrfs:346776 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
  [59.215]       Tainted: G        W          6.3.0-rc2-btrfs-next-127+ #1
  [59.216] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
  [59.217] task:btrfs           state:D stack:0     pid:346776 ppid:1      flags:0x00004002
  [59.217] Call Trace:
  [59.217]  <TASK>
  [59.217]  __schedule+0x392/0xa70
  [59.217]  ? __pv_queued_spin_lock_slowpath+0x165/0x370
  [59.217]  schedule+0x5d/0xd0
  [59.217]  __scrub_blocked_if_needed+0x74/0xc0 [btrfs]
  [59.217]  ? __pfx_autoremove_wake_function+0x10/0x10
  [59.217]  scrub_pause_off+0x21/0x50 [btrfs]
  [59.217]  scrub_simple_mirror+0x1c7/0x950 [btrfs]
  [59.217]  ? scrub_parity_put+0x1a5/0x1d0 [btrfs]
  [59.218]  ? __pfx_autoremove_wake_function+0x10/0x10
  [59.218]  scrub_stripe+0x20d/0x740 [btrfs]
  [59.218]  scrub_chunk+0xc4/0x130 [btrfs]
  [59.218]  scrub_enumerate_chunks+0x3e4/0x7a0 [btrfs]
  [59.219]  ? __pfx_autoremove_wake_function+0x10/0x10
  [59.219]  btrfs_scrub_dev+0x236/0x6a0 [btrfs]
  [59.219]  ? btrfs_ioctl+0xd97/0x32c0 [btrfs]
  [59.219]  ? _copy_from_user+0x7b/0x80
  [59.219]  btrfs_ioctl+0xde1/0x32c0 [btrfs]
  [59.219]  ? should_failslab+0xa/0x20
  [59.219]  ? kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x151/0x460
  [59.219]  ? alloc_io_context+0x1b/0x80
  [59.219]  ? preempt_count_add+0x70/0xa0
  [59.219]  ? __x64_sys_ioctl+0x88/0xc0
  [59.219]  __x64_sys_ioctl+0x88/0xc0
  [59.219]  do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
  [59.219]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x72/0xdc
  [59.219] RIP: 0033:0x7f82ffaffe9b
  [59.219] RSP: 002b:00007f82fd9f8c50 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
  [59.219] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000055b191e37510 RCX: 00007f82ffaffe9b
  [59.219] RDX: 000055b191e37510 RSI: 00000000c400941b RDI: 0000000000000003
  [59.219] RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 00007fff1575016f R09: 0000000000000000
  [59.219] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f82fd9f9640
  [59.219] R13: 000000000000006b R14: 00007f82ffa87580 R15: 0000000000000000
  [59.219]  </TASK>
  [59.219] INFO: task btrfs:346822 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
  [59.220]       Tainted: G        W          6.3.0-rc2-btrfs-next-127+ #1
  [59.221] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
  [59.222] task:btrfs           state:D stack:0     pid:346822 ppid:1      flags:0x00004002
  [59.222] Call Trace:
  [59.222]  <TASK>
  [59.222]  __schedule+0x392/0xa70
  [59.222]  schedule+0x5d/0xd0
  [59.222]  btrfs_scrub_cancel+0x91/0x100 [btrfs]
  [59.222]  ? __pfx_autoremove_wake_function+0x10/0x10
  [59.222]  btrfs_commit_transaction+0x572/0xeb0 [btrfs]
  [59.223]  ? start_transaction+0xcb/0x610 [btrfs]
  [59.223]  prepare_to_relocate+0x111/0x1a0 [btrfs]
  [59.223]  relocate_block_group+0x57/0x5d0 [btrfs]
  [59.223]  ? btrfs_wait_nocow_writers+0x25/0xb0 [btrfs]
  [59.223]  btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x248/0x3c0 [btrfs]
  [59.224]  ? __pfx_autoremove_wake_function+0x10/0x10
  [59.224]  btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x3b/0x150 [btrfs]
  [59.224]  btrfs_balance+0x8ff/0x11d0 [btrfs]
  [59.224]  ? __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x14a/0x410
  [59.224]  btrfs_ioctl+0x2334/0x32c0 [btrfs]
  [59.225]  ? mod_objcg_state+0xd2/0x360
  [59.225]  ? refill_obj_stock+0xb0/0x160
  [59.225]  ? seq_release+0x25/0x30
  [59.225]  ? __rseq_handle_notify_resume+0x3b5/0x4b0
  [59.225]  ? percpu_counter_add_batch+0x2e/0xa0
  [59.225]  ? __x64_sys_ioctl+0x88/0xc0
  [59.225]  __x64_sys_ioctl+0x88/0xc0
  [59.225]  do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
  [59.225]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x72/0xdc
  [59.225] RIP: 0033:0x7f381a6ffe9b
  [59.225] RSP: 002b:00007ffd45ecf060 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
  [59.225] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000001 RCX: 00007f381a6ffe9b
  [59.225] RDX: 00007ffd45ecf150 RSI: 00000000c4009420 RDI: 0000000000000003
  [59.225] RBP: 0000000000000003 R08: 0000000000000013 R09: 0000000000000000
  [59.225] R10: 00007f381a60c878 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007ffd45ed0423
  [59.225] R13: 00007ffd45ecf150 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 00007ffd45ecf148
  [59.225]  </TASK>

What happens is the following:

1) A scrub is running, so fs_info->scrubs_running is 1;

2) Task A starts block group relocation, and at btrfs_relocate_chunk() it
   pauses scrub by calling btrfs_scrub_pause(). That increments
   fs_info->scrub_pause_req from 0 to 1 and waits for the scrub task to
   pause (for fs_info->scrubs_paused to be == to fs_info->scrubs_running);

3) The scrub task pauses at scrub_pause_off(), waiting for
   fs_info->scrub_pause_req to decrease to 0;

4) Task A then enters btrfs_relocate_block_group(), and down that call
   chain we start a transaction and then attempt to commit it;

5) When task A calls btrfs_commit_transaction(), it either will do the
   commit itself or wait for some other task that already started the
   commit of the transaction - it doesn't matter which case;

6) The transaction commit enters state TRANS_STATE_COMMIT_START;

7) An error happens during the transaction commit, like -ENOSPC when
   running delayed refs or delayed items for example;

8) This results in calling transaction.c:cleanup_transaction(), where
   we call btrfs_scrub_cancel(), incrementing fs_info->scrub_cancel_req
   from 0 to 1, and blocking this task waiting for fs_info->scrubs_running
   to decrease to 0;

9) From this point on, both the transaction commit and the scrub task
   hang forever:

   1) The transaction commit is waiting for fs_info->scrubs_running to
      be decreased to 0;

   2) The scrub task is at scrub_pause_off() waiting for
      fs_info->scrub_pause_req to decrease to 0 - so it can not proceed
      to stop the scrub and decrement fs_info->scrubs_running from 0 to 1.

   Therefore resulting in a deadlock.

Fix this by having cleanup_transaction(), called if a transaction commit
fails, not call btrfs_scrub_cancel() if relocation is in progress, and
having btrfs_relocate_block_group() call btrfs_scrub_cancel() instead if
the relocation failed and a transaction abort happened.

This was triggered with btrfs/061 from fstests.

Fixes: 55e3a601c8 ("btrfs: Fix data checksum error cause by replace with io-load.")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-04-06 12:10:51 +02:00
Josef Bacik
efb0645bd9 btrfs: don't init io tree with private data for non-inodes
We only use this for normal inodes, so don't set it if we're not a
normal inode.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-09-26 12:28:05 +02:00
Josef Bacik
bd015294af btrfs: replace delete argument with EXTENT_CLEAR_ALL_BITS
Instead of taking up a whole argument to indicate we're clearing
everything in a range, simply add another EXTENT bit to control this,
and then update all the callers to drop this argument from the
clear_extent_bit variants.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-09-26 12:28:05 +02:00
Josef Bacik
dbbf49928f btrfs: remove the wake argument from clear_extent_bits
This is only used in the case that we are clearing EXTENT_LOCKED, so
infer this value from the bits passed in instead of taking it as an
argument.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-09-26 12:28:04 +02:00
David Sterba
748f553c3c btrfs: add KCSAN annotations for unlocked access to block_rsv->full
KCSAN reports that there's unlocked access mixed with locked access,
which is technically correct but is not a bug.  To avoid false alerts at
least from KCSAN, add annotation and use a wrapper whenever ->full is
accessed for read outside of lock.

It is used as a fast check and only advisory.  In the worst case the
block reserve is found !full and becomes full in the meantime, but
properly handled.

Depending on the value of ->full, btrfs_block_rsv_release decides
where to return the reservation, and block_rsv_release_bytes handles a
NULL pointer for block_rsv and if it's not NULL then it double checks
the full status under a lock.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CAAwBoOJDjei5Hnem155N_cJwiEkVwJYvgN-tQrwWbZQGhFU=cA@mail.gmail.com/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/YvHU/vsXd7uz5V6j@hungrycats.org
Reported-by: Zygo Blaxell <ce3g8jdj@umail.furryterror.org>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-09-26 12:28:02 +02:00
Qu Wenruo
14033b08a0 btrfs: don't save block group root into super block
The extent tree v2 needs a new root for storing all block group items,
the whole feature hasn't been finished yet so we can afford to do some
changes.

My initial proposal years ago just added a new tree rootid, and load it
from tree root, just like what we did for quota/free space tree/uuid/extent
roots.

But the extent tree v2 patches introduced a completely new way to store
block group tree root into super block which is arguably wasteful.

Currently there are only 3 trees stored in super blocks, and they all
have their valid reasons:

- Chunk root
  Needed for bootstrap.

- Tree root
  Really the entry point for all trees.

- Log root
  This is special as log root has to be updated out of existing
  transaction mechanism.

There is not even any reason to put block group root into super blocks,
the block group tree is updated at the same time as the old extent tree,
no need for extra bootstrap/out-of-transaction update.

So just move block group root from super block into tree root.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-09-26 12:28:00 +02:00
Omar Sandoval
48ff70830b btrfs: get rid of block group caching progress logic
struct btrfs_caching_ctl::progress and struct
btrfs_block_group::last_byte_to_unpin were previously needed to ensure
that unpin_extent_range() didn't return a range to the free space cache
before the caching thread had a chance to cache that range. However, the
commit "btrfs: fix space cache corruption and potential double
allocations" made it so that we always synchronously cache the block
group at the time that we pin the extent, so this machinery is no longer
necessary.

Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-09-26 12:27:58 +02:00
Ioannis Angelakopoulos
8b53779eaa btrfs: add lockdep annotations for pending_ordered wait event
In contrast to the num_writers and num_extwriters wait events, the
condition for the pending ordered wait event is signaled in a different
context from the wait event itself. The condition signaling occurs in
btrfs_remove_ordered_extent() in fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c while the wait
event is implemented in btrfs_commit_transaction() in
fs/btrfs/transaction.c

Thus the thread signaling the condition has to acquire the lockdep map
as a reader at the start of btrfs_remove_ordered_extent() and release it
after it has signaled the condition. In this case some dependencies
might be left out due to the placement of the annotation, but it is
better than no annotation at all.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Ioannis Angelakopoulos <iangelak@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-09-26 12:27:53 +02:00
Ioannis Angelakopoulos
3e738c531a btrfs: add lockdep annotations for transaction states wait events
Add lockdep annotations for the transaction states that have wait
events;

  1) TRANS_STATE_COMMIT_START
  2) TRANS_STATE_UNBLOCKED
  3) TRANS_STATE_SUPER_COMMITTED
  4) TRANS_STATE_COMPLETED

The new macros introduced here to annotate the transaction states wait
events have the same effect as the generic lockdep annotation macros.

With the exception of the lockdep annotation for TRANS_STATE_COMMIT_START
the transaction thread has to acquire the lockdep maps for the
transaction states as reader after the lockdep map for num_writers is
released so that lockdep does not complain.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Ioannis Angelakopoulos <iangelak@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-09-26 12:27:53 +02:00
Ioannis Angelakopoulos
5a9ba6709f btrfs: add lockdep annotations for num_extwriters wait event
Similarly to the num_writers wait event in fs/btrfs/transaction.c add a
lockdep annotation for the num_extwriters wait event.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Ioannis Angelakopoulos <iangelak@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-09-26 12:27:53 +02:00
Ioannis Angelakopoulos
e1489b4fe6 btrfs: add lockdep annotations for num_writers wait event
Annotate the num_writers wait event in fs/btrfs/transaction.c with
lockdep in order to catch deadlocks involving this wait event.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Ioannis Angelakopoulos <iangelak@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-09-26 12:27:53 +02:00
David Sterba
c1867eb33e btrfs: clean up chained assignments
The chained assignments may be convenient to write, but make readability
a bit worse as it's too easy to overlook that there are several values
set on the same line while this is rather an exception.  Making it
consistent everywhere avoids surprises.

The pattern where inode times are initialized reuses the first value and
the order is mtime, ctime. In other blocks the assignments are expanded
so the order of variables is similar to the neighboring code.

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-07-25 17:45:39 +02:00
Ioannis Angelakopoulos
e55958c8a0 btrfs: collect commit stats, count, duration
Track several stats about transaction commit, to be later exported via
sysfs:

- number of commits so far
- duration of the last commit in ns
- maximum commit duration seen so far in ns
- total duration for all commits so far in ns

The update of the commit stats occurs after the commit thread has gone
through all the logic that checks if there is another thread committing
at the same time. This means that we only account for actual commit work
in the commit stats we report and not the time the thread spends waiting
until it is ready to do the commit work.

Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Ioannis Angelakopoulos <iangelak@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-07-25 17:45:37 +02:00
David Sterba
fc7cbcd489 Revert "btrfs: turn fs_roots_radix in btrfs_fs_info into an XArray"
This reverts commit 48b36a602a.

Revert the xarray conversion, there's a problem with potential
sleep-inside-spinlock [1] when calling xa_insert that triggers GFP_NOFS
allocation. The radix tree used the preloading mechanism to avoid
sleeping but this is not available in xarray.

Conversion from spin lock to mutex is possible but at time of rc6 is
riskier than a clean revert.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/cover.1657097693.git.fdmanana@suse.com/

Reported-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-07-15 19:14:28 +02:00
Gabriel Niebler
48b36a602a btrfs: turn fs_roots_radix in btrfs_fs_info into an XArray
… rename it to simply fs_roots and adjust all usages of this object to use
the XArray API, because it is notionally easier to use and understand, as
it provides array semantics, and also takes care of locking for us,
further simplifying the code.

Also do some refactoring, esp. where the API change requires largely
rewriting some functions, anyway.

Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Gabriel Niebler <gniebler@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-05-16 17:15:57 +02:00
Filipe Manana
16b0c2581e btrfs: use a read/write lock for protecting the block groups tree
Currently we use a spin lock to protect the red black tree that we use to
track block groups. Most accesses to that tree are actually read only and
for large filesystems, with thousands of block groups, it actually has
a bad impact on performance, as concurrent read only searches on the tree
are serialized.

Read only searches on the tree are very frequent and done when:

1) Pinning and unpinning extents, as we need to lookup the respective
   block group from the tree;

2) Freeing the last reference of a tree block, regardless if we pin the
   underlying extent or add it back to free space cache/tree;

3) During NOCOW writes, both buffered IO and direct IO, we need to check
   if the block group that contains an extent is read only or not and to
   increment the number of NOCOW writers in the block group. For those
   operations we need to search for the block group in the tree.
   Similarly, after creating the ordered extent for the NOCOW write, we
   need to decrement the number of NOCOW writers from the same block
   group, which requires searching for it in the tree;

4) Decreasing the number of extent reservations in a block group;

5) When allocating extents and freeing reserved extents;

6) Adding and removing free space to the free space tree;

7) When releasing delalloc bytes during ordered extent completion;

8) When relocating a block group;

9) During fitrim, to iterate over the block groups;

10) etc;

Write accesses to the tree, to add or remove block groups, are much less
frequent as they happen only when allocating a new block group or when
deleting a block group.

We also use the same spin lock to protect the list of currently caching
block groups. Additions to this list are made when we need to cache a
block group, because we don't have a free space cache for it (or we have
but it's invalid), and removals from this list are done when caching of
the block group's free space finishes. These cases are also not very
common, but when they happen, they happen only once when the filesystem
is mounted.

So switch the lock that protects the tree of block groups from a spinning
lock to a read/write lock.

Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-05-16 17:03:13 +02:00
Josef Bacik
33c4418499 btrfs: pass btrfs_fs_info for deleting snapshots and cleaner
We're passing a root around here, but we only really need the fs_info,
so fix up btrfs_clean_one_deleted_snapshot() to take an fs_info instead,
and then fix up all the callers appropriately.

Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-03-14 13:13:52 +01:00
Josef Bacik
f7238e5094 btrfs: add support for multiple global roots
With extent tree v2 you will be able to create multiple csum, extent,
and free space trees.  They will be used based on the block group, which
will now use the block_group_item->chunk_objectid to point to the set of
global roots that it will use.  When allocating new block groups we'll
simply mod the gigabyte offset of the block group against the number of
global roots we have and that will be the block groups global id.

>From there we can take the bytenr that we're modifying in the respective
tree, look up the block group and get that block groups corresponding
global root id.  From there we can get to the appropriate global root
for that bytenr.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-03-14 13:13:49 +01:00
Omar Sandoval
5fd76bf31c btrfs: fix relocation crash due to premature return from btrfs_commit_transaction()
We are seeing crashes similar to the following trace:

[38.969182] WARNING: CPU: 20 PID: 2105 at fs/btrfs/relocation.c:4070 btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x2dc/0x340 [btrfs]
[38.973556] CPU: 20 PID: 2105 Comm: btrfs Not tainted 5.17.0-rc4 #54
[38.974580] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.12.0-59-gc9ba5276e321-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
[38.976539] RIP: 0010:btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x2dc/0x340 [btrfs]
[38.980336] RSP: 0000:ffffb0dd42e03c20 EFLAGS: 00010206
[38.981218] RAX: ffff96cfc4ede800 RBX: ffff96cfc3ce0000 RCX: 000000000002ca14
[38.982560] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 4cfd109a0bcb5d7f RDI: ffff96cfc3ce0360
[38.983619] RBP: ffff96cfc309c000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
[38.984678] R10: ffff96cec0000001 R11: ffffe84c80000000 R12: ffff96cfc4ede800
[38.985735] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff96cfc3ce0360
[38.987146] FS:  00007f11c15218c0(0000) GS:ffff96d6dfb00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[38.988662] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[38.989398] CR2: 00007ffc922c8e60 CR3: 00000001147a6001 CR4: 0000000000370ee0
[38.990279] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
[38.991219] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
[38.992528] Call Trace:
[38.992854]  <TASK>
[38.993148]  btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x27/0xe0 [btrfs]
[38.993941]  btrfs_balance+0x78e/0xea0 [btrfs]
[38.994801]  ? vsnprintf+0x33c/0x520
[38.995368]  ? __kmalloc_track_caller+0x351/0x440
[38.996198]  btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x2b9/0x3a0 [btrfs]
[38.997084]  btrfs_ioctl+0x11b0/0x2da0 [btrfs]
[38.997867]  ? mod_objcg_state+0xee/0x340
[38.998552]  ? seq_release+0x24/0x30
[38.999184]  ? proc_nr_files+0x30/0x30
[38.999654]  ? call_rcu+0xc8/0x2f0
[39.000228]  ? __x64_sys_ioctl+0x84/0xc0
[39.000872]  ? btrfs_ioctl_get_supported_features+0x30/0x30 [btrfs]
[39.001973]  __x64_sys_ioctl+0x84/0xc0
[39.002566]  do_syscall_64+0x3a/0x80
[39.003011]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
[39.003735] RIP: 0033:0x7f11c166959b
[39.007324] RSP: 002b:00007fff2543e998 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
[39.008521] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f11c1521698 RCX: 00007f11c166959b
[39.009833] RDX: 00007fff2543ea40 RSI: 00000000c4009420 RDI: 0000000000000003
[39.011270] RBP: 0000000000000003 R08: 0000000000000013 R09: 00007f11c16f94e0
[39.012581] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007fff25440df3
[39.014046] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 00007fff2543ea40 R15: 0000000000000001
[39.015040]  </TASK>
[39.015418] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
[43.131559] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[43.132234] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:2717!
[43.133031] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI
[43.133702] CPU: 1 PID: 1839 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G        W         5.17.0-rc4 #54
[43.134863] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.12.0-59-gc9ba5276e321-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
[43.136426] RIP: 0010:unpin_extent_range+0x37a/0x4f0 [btrfs]
[43.139913] RSP: 0000:ffffb0dd4216bc70 EFLAGS: 00010246
[43.140629] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff96cfc34490f8 RCX: 0000000000000001
[43.141604] RDX: 0000000080000001 RSI: 0000000051d00000 RDI: 00000000ffffffff
[43.142645] RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffff96cfd07dca50
[43.143669] R10: ffff96cfc46e8a00 R11: fffffffffffec000 R12: 0000000041d00000
[43.144657] R13: ffff96cfc3ce0000 R14: ffffb0dd4216bd08 R15: 0000000000000000
[43.145686] FS:  00007f7657dd68c0(0000) GS:ffff96d6df640000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[43.146808] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[43.147584] CR2: 00007f7fe81bf5b0 CR3: 00000001093ee004 CR4: 0000000000370ee0
[43.148589] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
[43.149581] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
[43.150559] Call Trace:
[43.150904]  <TASK>
[43.151253]  btrfs_finish_extent_commit+0x88/0x290 [btrfs]
[43.152127]  btrfs_commit_transaction+0x74f/0xaa0 [btrfs]
[43.152932]  ? btrfs_attach_transaction_barrier+0x1e/0x50 [btrfs]
[43.153786]  btrfs_ioctl+0x1edc/0x2da0 [btrfs]
[43.154475]  ? __check_object_size+0x150/0x170
[43.155170]  ? preempt_count_add+0x49/0xa0
[43.155753]  ? __x64_sys_ioctl+0x84/0xc0
[43.156437]  ? btrfs_ioctl_get_supported_features+0x30/0x30 [btrfs]
[43.157456]  __x64_sys_ioctl+0x84/0xc0
[43.157980]  do_syscall_64+0x3a/0x80
[43.158543]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
[43.159231] RIP: 0033:0x7f7657f1e59b
[43.161819] RSP: 002b:00007ffda5cd1658 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
[43.162702] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000001 RCX: 00007f7657f1e59b
[43.163526] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000009408 RDI: 0000000000000003
[43.164358] RBP: 0000000000000003 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
[43.165208] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
[43.166029] R13: 00005621b91c3232 R14: 00005621b91ba580 R15: 00007ffda5cd1800
[43.166863]  </TASK>
[43.167125] Modules linked in: btrfs blake2b_generic xor pata_acpi ata_piix libata raid6_pq scsi_mod libcrc32c virtio_net virtio_rng net_failover rng_core failover scsi_common
[43.169552] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
[43.171226] RIP: 0010:unpin_extent_range+0x37a/0x4f0 [btrfs]
[43.174767] RSP: 0000:ffffb0dd4216bc70 EFLAGS: 00010246
[43.175600] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff96cfc34490f8 RCX: 0000000000000001
[43.176468] RDX: 0000000080000001 RSI: 0000000051d00000 RDI: 00000000ffffffff
[43.177357] RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffff96cfd07dca50
[43.178271] R10: ffff96cfc46e8a00 R11: fffffffffffec000 R12: 0000000041d00000
[43.179178] R13: ffff96cfc3ce0000 R14: ffffb0dd4216bd08 R15: 0000000000000000
[43.180071] FS:  00007f7657dd68c0(0000) GS:ffff96d6df800000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[43.181073] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[43.181808] CR2: 00007fe09905f010 CR3: 00000001093ee004 CR4: 0000000000370ee0
[43.182706] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
[43.183591] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400

We first hit the WARN_ON(rc->block_group->pinned > 0) in
btrfs_relocate_block_group() and then the BUG_ON(!cache) in
unpin_extent_range(). This tells us that we are exiting relocation and
removing the block group with bytes still pinned for that block group.
This is supposed to be impossible: the last thing relocate_block_group()
does is commit the transaction to get rid of pinned extents.

Commit d0c2f4fa55 ("btrfs: make concurrent fsyncs wait less when
waiting for a transaction commit") introduced an optimization so that
commits from fsync don't have to wait for the previous commit to unpin
extents. This was only intended to affect fsync, but it inadvertently
made it possible for any commit to skip waiting for the previous commit
to unpin. This is because if a call to btrfs_commit_transaction() finds
that another thread is already committing the transaction, it waits for
the other thread to complete the commit and then returns. If that other
thread was in fsync, then it completes the commit without completing the
previous commit. This makes the following sequence of events possible:

Thread 1____________________|Thread 2 (fsync)_____________________|Thread 3 (balance)___________________
btrfs_commit_transaction(N) |                                     |
  btrfs_run_delayed_refs    |                                     |
    pin extents             |                                     |
  ...                       |                                     |
  state = UNBLOCKED         |btrfs_sync_file                      |
                            |  btrfs_start_transaction(N + 1)     |relocate_block_group
                            |                                     |  btrfs_join_transaction(N + 1)
                            |  btrfs_commit_transaction(N + 1)    |
  ...                       |  trans->state = COMMIT_START        |
                            |                                     |  btrfs_commit_transaction(N + 1)
                            |                                     |    wait_for_commit(N + 1, COMPLETED)
                            |  wait_for_commit(N, SUPER_COMMITTED)|
  state = SUPER_COMMITTED   |  ...                                |
  btrfs_finish_extent_commit|                                     |
    unpin_extent_range()    |  trans->state = COMPLETED           |
                            |                                     |    return
                            |                                     |
    ...                     |                                     |Thread 1 isn't done, so pinned > 0
                            |                                     |and we WARN
                            |                                     |
                            |                                     |btrfs_remove_block_group
    unpin_extent_range()    |                                     |
      Thread 3 removed the  |                                     |
      block group, so we BUG|                                     |

There are other sequences involving SUPER_COMMITTED transactions that
can cause a similar outcome.

We could fix this by making relocation explicitly wait for unpinning,
but there may be other cases that need it. Josef mentioned ENOSPC
flushing and the free space cache inode as other potential victims.
Rather than playing whack-a-mole, this fix is conservative and makes all
commits not in fsync wait for all previous transactions, which is what
the optimization intended.

Fixes: d0c2f4fa55 ("btrfs: make concurrent fsyncs wait less when waiting for a transaction commit")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.15+
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-03-02 16:52:46 +01:00
Josef Bacik
b4be6aefa7 btrfs: do not start relocation until in progress drops are done
We hit a bug with a recovering relocation on mount for one of our file
systems in production.  I reproduced this locally by injecting errors
into snapshot delete with balance running at the same time.  This
presented as an error while looking up an extent item

  WARNING: CPU: 5 PID: 1501 at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:866 lookup_inline_extent_backref+0x647/0x680
  CPU: 5 PID: 1501 Comm: btrfs-balance Not tainted 5.16.0-rc8+ #8
  RIP: 0010:lookup_inline_extent_backref+0x647/0x680
  RSP: 0018:ffffae0a023ab960 EFLAGS: 00010202
  RAX: 0000000000000001 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000000
  RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 000000000000000c RDI: 0000000000000000
  RBP: ffff943fd2a39b60 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000001
  R10: 0001434088152de0 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000001d05000
  R13: ffff943fd2a39b60 R14: ffff943fdb96f2a0 R15: ffff9442fc923000
  FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff944e9eb40000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
  CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
  CR2: 00007f1157b1fca8 CR3: 000000010f092000 CR4: 0000000000350ee0
  Call Trace:
   <TASK>
   insert_inline_extent_backref+0x46/0xd0
   __btrfs_inc_extent_ref.isra.0+0x5f/0x200
   ? btrfs_merge_delayed_refs+0x164/0x190
   __btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x561/0xfa0
   ? btrfs_search_slot+0x7b4/0xb30
   ? btrfs_update_root+0x1a9/0x2c0
   btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x73/0x1f0
   ? btrfs_update_root+0x1a9/0x2c0
   btrfs_commit_transaction+0x50/0xa50
   ? btrfs_update_reloc_root+0x122/0x220
   prepare_to_merge+0x29f/0x320
   relocate_block_group+0x2b8/0x550
   btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x1a6/0x350
   btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x27/0xe0
   btrfs_balance+0x777/0xe60
   balance_kthread+0x35/0x50
   ? btrfs_balance+0xe60/0xe60
   kthread+0x16b/0x190
   ? set_kthread_struct+0x40/0x40
   ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
   </TASK>

Normally snapshot deletion and relocation are excluded from running at
the same time by the fs_info->cleaner_mutex.  However if we had a
pending balance waiting to get the ->cleaner_mutex, and a snapshot
deletion was running, and then the box crashed, we would come up in a
state where we have a half deleted snapshot.

Again, in the normal case the snapshot deletion needs to complete before
relocation can start, but in this case relocation could very well start
before the snapshot deletion completes, as we simply add the root to the
dead roots list and wait for the next time the cleaner runs to clean up
the snapshot.

Fix this by setting a bit on the fs_info if we have any DEAD_ROOT's that
had a pending drop_progress key.  If they do then we know we were in the
middle of the drop operation and set a flag on the fs_info.  Then
balance can wait until this flag is cleared to start up again.

If there are DEAD_ROOT's that don't have a drop_progress set then we're
safe to start balance right away as we'll be properly protected by the
cleaner_mutex.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10+
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-03-02 16:52:39 +01:00
Filipe Manana
a0f0cf8341 btrfs: get rid of warning on transaction commit when using flushoncommit
When using the flushoncommit mount option, during almost every transaction
commit we trigger a warning from __writeback_inodes_sb_nr():

  $ cat fs/fs-writeback.c:
  (...)
  static void __writeback_inodes_sb_nr(struct super_block *sb, ...
  {
        (...)
        WARN_ON(!rwsem_is_locked(&sb->s_umount));
        (...)
  }
  (...)

The trace produced in dmesg looks like the following:

  [947.473890] WARNING: CPU: 5 PID: 930 at fs/fs-writeback.c:2610 __writeback_inodes_sb_nr+0x7e/0xb3
  [947.481623] Modules linked in: nfsd nls_cp437 cifs asn1_decoder cifs_arc4 fscache cifs_md4 ipmi_ssif
  [947.489571] CPU: 5 PID: 930 Comm: btrfs-transacti Not tainted 95.16.3-srb-asrock-00001-g36437ad63879 #186
  [947.497969] RIP: 0010:__writeback_inodes_sb_nr+0x7e/0xb3
  [947.502097] Code: 24 10 4c 89 44 24 18 c6 (...)
  [947.519760] RSP: 0018:ffffc90000777e10 EFLAGS: 00010246
  [947.523818] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000963300 RCX: 0000000000000000
  [947.529765] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 000000000000fa51 RDI: ffffc90000777e50
  [947.535740] RBP: ffff888101628a90 R08: ffff888100955800 R09: ffff888100956000
  [947.541701] R10: 0000000000000002 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff888100963488
  [947.547645] R13: ffff888100963000 R14: ffff888112fb7200 R15: ffff888100963460
  [947.553621] FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88841fd40000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
  [947.560537] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
  [947.565122] CR2: 0000000008be50c4 CR3: 000000000220c000 CR4: 00000000001006e0
  [947.571072] Call Trace:
  [947.572354]  <TASK>
  [947.573266]  btrfs_commit_transaction+0x1f1/0x998
  [947.576785]  ? start_transaction+0x3ab/0x44e
  [947.579867]  ? schedule_timeout+0x8a/0xdd
  [947.582716]  transaction_kthread+0xe9/0x156
  [947.585721]  ? btrfs_cleanup_transaction.isra.0+0x407/0x407
  [947.590104]  kthread+0x131/0x139
  [947.592168]  ? set_kthread_struct+0x32/0x32
  [947.595174]  ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
  [947.597561]  </TASK>
  [947.598553] ---[ end trace 644721052755541c ]---

This is because we started using writeback_inodes_sb() to flush delalloc
when committing a transaction (when using -o flushoncommit), in order to
avoid deadlocks with filesystem freeze operations. This change was made
by commit ce8ea7cc6e ("btrfs: don't call btrfs_start_delalloc_roots
in flushoncommit"). After that change we started producing that warning,
and every now and then a user reports this since the warning happens too
often, it spams dmesg/syslog, and a user is unsure if this reflects any
problem that might compromise the filesystem's reliability.

We can not just lock the sb->s_umount semaphore before calling
writeback_inodes_sb(), because that would at least deadlock with
filesystem freezing, since at fs/super.c:freeze_super() sync_filesystem()
is called while we are holding that semaphore in write mode, and that can
trigger a transaction commit, resulting in a deadlock. It would also
trigger the same type of deadlock in the unmount path. Possibly, it could
also introduce some other locking dependencies that lockdep would report.

To fix this call try_to_writeback_inodes_sb() instead of
writeback_inodes_sb(), because that will try to read lock sb->s_umount
and then will only call writeback_inodes_sb() if it was able to lock it.
This is fine because the cases where it can't read lock sb->s_umount
are during a filesystem unmount or during a filesystem freeze - in those
cases sb->s_umount is write locked and sync_filesystem() is called, which
calls writeback_inodes_sb(). In other words, in all cases where we can't
take a read lock on sb->s_umount, writeback is already being triggered
elsewhere.

An alternative would be to call btrfs_start_delalloc_roots() with a
number of pages different from LONG_MAX, for example matching the number
of delalloc bytes we currently have, in which case we would end up
starting all delalloc with filemap_fdatawrite_wbc() and not with an
async flush via filemap_flush() - that is only possible after the rather
recent commit e076ab2a2c ("btrfs: shrink delalloc pages instead of
full inodes"). However that creates a whole new can of worms due to new
lock dependencies, which lockdep complains, like for example:

[ 8948.247280] ======================================================
[ 8948.247823] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
[ 8948.248353] 5.17.0-rc1-btrfs-next-111 #1 Not tainted
[ 8948.248786] ------------------------------------------------------
[ 8948.249320] kworker/u16:18/933570 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 8948.249812] ffff9b3de1591690 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: find_free_extent+0x141e/0x1590 [btrfs]
[ 8948.250638]
               but task is already holding lock:
[ 8948.251140] ffff9b3e09c717d8 (&root->delalloc_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: start_delalloc_inodes+0x78/0x400 [btrfs]
[ 8948.252018]
               which lock already depends on the new lock.

[ 8948.252710]
               the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
[ 8948.253343]
               -> #2 (&root->delalloc_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
[ 8948.253950]        __mutex_lock+0x90/0x900
[ 8948.254354]        start_delalloc_inodes+0x78/0x400 [btrfs]
[ 8948.254859]        btrfs_start_delalloc_roots+0x194/0x2a0 [btrfs]
[ 8948.255408]        btrfs_commit_transaction+0x32f/0xc00 [btrfs]
[ 8948.255942]        btrfs_mksubvol+0x380/0x570 [btrfs]
[ 8948.256406]        btrfs_mksnapshot+0x81/0xb0 [btrfs]
[ 8948.256870]        __btrfs_ioctl_snap_create+0x17f/0x190 [btrfs]
[ 8948.257413]        btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_v2+0xbb/0x140 [btrfs]
[ 8948.257961]        btrfs_ioctl+0x1196/0x3630 [btrfs]
[ 8948.258418]        __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0
[ 8948.258793]        do_syscall_64+0x3b/0xc0
[ 8948.259146]        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
[ 8948.259709]
               -> #1 (&fs_info->delalloc_root_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
[ 8948.260330]        __mutex_lock+0x90/0x900
[ 8948.260692]        btrfs_start_delalloc_roots+0x97/0x2a0 [btrfs]
[ 8948.261234]        btrfs_commit_transaction+0x32f/0xc00 [btrfs]
[ 8948.261766]        btrfs_set_free_space_cache_v1_active+0x38/0x60 [btrfs]
[ 8948.262379]        btrfs_start_pre_rw_mount+0x119/0x180 [btrfs]
[ 8948.262909]        open_ctree+0x1511/0x171e [btrfs]
[ 8948.263359]        btrfs_mount_root.cold+0x12/0xde [btrfs]
[ 8948.263863]        legacy_get_tree+0x30/0x50
[ 8948.264242]        vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0
[ 8948.264594]        vfs_kern_mount.part.0+0x71/0xb0
[ 8948.265017]        btrfs_mount+0x11d/0x3a0 [btrfs]
[ 8948.265462]        legacy_get_tree+0x30/0x50
[ 8948.265851]        vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0
[ 8948.266203]        path_mount+0x2d4/0xbe0
[ 8948.266554]        __x64_sys_mount+0x103/0x140
[ 8948.266940]        do_syscall_64+0x3b/0xc0
[ 8948.267300]        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
[ 8948.267790]
               -> #0 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}:
[ 8948.268322]        __lock_acquire+0x12e8/0x2260
[ 8948.268733]        lock_acquire+0xd7/0x310
[ 8948.269092]        start_transaction+0x44c/0x6e0 [btrfs]
[ 8948.269591]        find_free_extent+0x141e/0x1590 [btrfs]
[ 8948.270087]        btrfs_reserve_extent+0x14b/0x280 [btrfs]
[ 8948.270588]        cow_file_range+0x17e/0x490 [btrfs]
[ 8948.271051]        btrfs_run_delalloc_range+0x345/0x7a0 [btrfs]
[ 8948.271586]        writepage_delalloc+0xb5/0x170 [btrfs]
[ 8948.272071]        __extent_writepage+0x156/0x3c0 [btrfs]
[ 8948.272579]        extent_write_cache_pages+0x263/0x460 [btrfs]
[ 8948.273113]        extent_writepages+0x76/0x130 [btrfs]
[ 8948.273573]        do_writepages+0xd2/0x1c0
[ 8948.273942]        filemap_fdatawrite_wbc+0x68/0x90
[ 8948.274371]        start_delalloc_inodes+0x17f/0x400 [btrfs]
[ 8948.274876]        btrfs_start_delalloc_roots+0x194/0x2a0 [btrfs]
[ 8948.275417]        flush_space+0x1f2/0x630 [btrfs]
[ 8948.275863]        btrfs_async_reclaim_data_space+0x108/0x1b0 [btrfs]
[ 8948.276438]        process_one_work+0x252/0x5a0
[ 8948.276829]        worker_thread+0x55/0x3b0
[ 8948.277189]        kthread+0xf2/0x120
[ 8948.277506]        ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
[ 8948.277868]
               other info that might help us debug this:

[ 8948.278548] Chain exists of:
                 sb_internal#2 --> &fs_info->delalloc_root_mutex --> &root->delalloc_mutex

[ 8948.279601]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:

[ 8948.280102]        CPU0                    CPU1
[ 8948.280508]        ----                    ----
[ 8948.280915]   lock(&root->delalloc_mutex);
[ 8948.281271]                                lock(&fs_info->delalloc_root_mutex);
[ 8948.281915]                                lock(&root->delalloc_mutex);
[ 8948.282487]   lock(sb_internal#2);
[ 8948.282800]
                *** DEADLOCK ***

[ 8948.283333] 4 locks held by kworker/u16:18/933570:
[ 8948.283750]  #0: ffff9b3dc00a9d48 ((wq_completion)events_unbound){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1d2/0x5a0
[ 8948.284609]  #1: ffffa90349dafe70 ((work_completion)(&fs_info->async_data_reclaim_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1d2/0x5a0
[ 8948.285637]  #2: ffff9b3e14db5040 (&fs_info->delalloc_root_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_start_delalloc_roots+0x97/0x2a0 [btrfs]
[ 8948.286674]  #3: ffff9b3e09c717d8 (&root->delalloc_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: start_delalloc_inodes+0x78/0x400 [btrfs]
[ 8948.287596]
              stack backtrace:
[ 8948.287975] CPU: 3 PID: 933570 Comm: kworker/u16:18 Not tainted 5.17.0-rc1-btrfs-next-111 #1
[ 8948.288677] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
[ 8948.289649] Workqueue: events_unbound btrfs_async_reclaim_data_space [btrfs]
[ 8948.290298] Call Trace:
[ 8948.290517]  <TASK>
[ 8948.290700]  dump_stack_lvl+0x59/0x73
[ 8948.291026]  check_noncircular+0xf3/0x110
[ 8948.291375]  ? start_transaction+0x228/0x6e0 [btrfs]
[ 8948.291826]  __lock_acquire+0x12e8/0x2260
[ 8948.292241]  lock_acquire+0xd7/0x310
[ 8948.292714]  ? find_free_extent+0x141e/0x1590 [btrfs]
[ 8948.293241]  ? lock_is_held_type+0xea/0x140
[ 8948.293601]  start_transaction+0x44c/0x6e0 [btrfs]
[ 8948.294055]  ? find_free_extent+0x141e/0x1590 [btrfs]
[ 8948.294518]  find_free_extent+0x141e/0x1590 [btrfs]
[ 8948.294957]  ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x29/0x40
[ 8948.295312]  ? btrfs_get_alloc_profile+0x124/0x290 [btrfs]
[ 8948.295813]  btrfs_reserve_extent+0x14b/0x280 [btrfs]
[ 8948.296270]  cow_file_range+0x17e/0x490 [btrfs]
[ 8948.296691]  btrfs_run_delalloc_range+0x345/0x7a0 [btrfs]
[ 8948.297175]  ? find_lock_delalloc_range+0x247/0x270 [btrfs]
[ 8948.297678]  writepage_delalloc+0xb5/0x170 [btrfs]
[ 8948.298123]  __extent_writepage+0x156/0x3c0 [btrfs]
[ 8948.298570]  extent_write_cache_pages+0x263/0x460 [btrfs]
[ 8948.299061]  extent_writepages+0x76/0x130 [btrfs]
[ 8948.299495]  do_writepages+0xd2/0x1c0
[ 8948.299817]  ? sched_clock_cpu+0xd/0x110
[ 8948.300160]  ? lock_release+0x155/0x4a0
[ 8948.300494]  filemap_fdatawrite_wbc+0x68/0x90
[ 8948.300874]  ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x4b/0xa0
[ 8948.301243]  start_delalloc_inodes+0x17f/0x400 [btrfs]
[ 8948.301706]  ? lock_release+0x155/0x4a0
[ 8948.302055]  btrfs_start_delalloc_roots+0x194/0x2a0 [btrfs]
[ 8948.302564]  flush_space+0x1f2/0x630 [btrfs]
[ 8948.302970]  btrfs_async_reclaim_data_space+0x108/0x1b0 [btrfs]
[ 8948.303510]  process_one_work+0x252/0x5a0
[ 8948.303860]  ? process_one_work+0x5a0/0x5a0
[ 8948.304221]  worker_thread+0x55/0x3b0
[ 8948.304543]  ? process_one_work+0x5a0/0x5a0
[ 8948.304904]  kthread+0xf2/0x120
[ 8948.305184]  ? kthread_complete_and_exit+0x20/0x20
[ 8948.305598]  ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
[ 8948.305921]  </TASK>

It all comes from the fact that btrfs_start_delalloc_roots() takes the
delalloc_root_mutex, in the transaction commit path we are holding a
read lock on one of the superblock's freeze semaphores (via
sb_start_intwrite()), the async reclaim task can also do a call to
btrfs_start_delalloc_roots(), which ends up triggering writeback with
calls to filemap_fdatawrite_wbc(), resulting in extent allocation which
in turn can call btrfs_start_transaction(), which will result in taking
the freeze semaphore via sb_start_intwrite(), forming a nasty dependency
on all those locks which can be taken in different orders by different
code paths.

So just adopt the simple approach of calling try_to_writeback_inodes_sb()
at btrfs_start_delalloc_flush().

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/20220130005258.GA7465@cuci.nl/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/43acc426-d683-d1b6-729d-c6bc4a2fff4d@gmail.com/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/6833930a-08d7-6fbc-0141-eb9cdfd6bb4d@gmail.com/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/20190322041731.GF16651@hungrycats.org/
Reviewed-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
[ add more link reports ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-02-09 18:53:26 +01:00
Filipe Manana
28b21c558a btrfs: fix use-after-free after failure to create a snapshot
At ioctl.c:create_snapshot(), we allocate a pending snapshot structure and
then attach it to the transaction's list of pending snapshots. After that
we call btrfs_commit_transaction(), and if that returns an error we jump
to 'fail' label, where we kfree() the pending snapshot structure. This can
result in a later use-after-free of the pending snapshot:

1) We allocated the pending snapshot and added it to the transaction's
   list of pending snapshots;

2) We call btrfs_commit_transaction(), and it fails either at the first
   call to btrfs_run_delayed_refs() or btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups().
   In both cases, we don't abort the transaction and we release our
   transaction handle. We jump to the 'fail' label and free the pending
   snapshot structure. We return with the pending snapshot still in the
   transaction's list;

3) Another task commits the transaction. This time there's no error at
   all, and then during the transaction commit it accesses a pointer
   to the pending snapshot structure that the snapshot creation task
   has already freed, resulting in a user-after-free.

This issue could actually be detected by smatch, which produced the
following warning:

  fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:843 create_snapshot() warn: '&pending_snapshot->list' not removed from list

So fix this by not having the snapshot creation ioctl directly add the
pending snapshot to the transaction's list. Instead add the pending
snapshot to the transaction handle, and then at btrfs_commit_transaction()
we add the snapshot to the list only when we can guarantee that any error
returned after that point will result in a transaction abort, in which
case the ioctl code can safely free the pending snapshot and no one can
access it anymore.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10+
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-01-31 16:06:09 +01:00
Filipe Manana
d96b34248c btrfs: make send work with concurrent block group relocation
We don't allow send and balance/relocation to run in parallel in order
to prevent send failing or silently producing some bad stream. This is
because while send is using an extent (specially metadata) or about to
read a metadata extent and expecting it belongs to a specific parent
node, relocation can run, the transaction used for the relocation is
committed and the extent gets reallocated while send is still using the
extent, so it ends up with a different content than expected. This can
result in just failing to read a metadata extent due to failure of the
validation checks (parent transid, level, etc), failure to find a
backreference for a data extent, and other unexpected failures. Besides
reallocation, there's also a similar problem of an extent getting
discarded when it's unpinned after the transaction used for block group
relocation is committed.

The restriction between balance and send was added in commit 9e967495e0
("Btrfs: prevent send failures and crashes due to concurrent relocation"),
kernel 5.3, while the more general restriction between send and relocation
was added in commit 1cea5cf0e6 ("btrfs: ensure relocation never runs
while we have send operations running"), kernel 5.14.

Both send and relocation can be very long running operations. Relocation
because it has to do a lot of IO and expensive backreference lookups in
case there are many snapshots, and send due to read IO when operating on
very large trees. This makes it inconvenient for users and tools to deal
with scheduling both operations.

For zoned filesystem we also have automatic block group relocation, so
send can fail with -EAGAIN when users least expect it or send can end up
delaying the block group relocation for too long. In the future we might
also get the automatic block group relocation for non zoned filesystems.

This change makes it possible for send and relocation to run in parallel.
This is achieved the following way:

1) For all tree searches, send acquires a read lock on the commit root
   semaphore;

2) After each tree search, and before releasing the commit root semaphore,
   the leaf is cloned and placed in the search path (struct btrfs_path);

3) After releasing the commit root semaphore, the changed_cb() callback
   is invoked, which operates on the leaf and writes commands to the pipe
   (or file in case send/receive is not used with a pipe). It's important
   here to not hold a lock on the commit root semaphore, because if we did
   we could deadlock when sending and receiving to the same filesystem
   using a pipe - the send task blocks on the pipe because it's full, the
   receive task, which is the only consumer of the pipe, triggers a
   transaction commit when attempting to create a subvolume or reserve
   space for a write operation for example, but the transaction commit
   blocks trying to write lock the commit root semaphore, resulting in a
   deadlock;

4) Before moving to the next key, or advancing to the next change in case
   of an incremental send, check if a transaction used for relocation was
   committed (or is about to finish its commit). If so, release the search
   path(s) and restart the search, to where we were before, so that we
   don't operate on stale extent buffers. The search restarts are always
   possible because both the send and parent roots are RO, and no one can
   add, remove of update keys (change their offset) in RO trees - the
   only exception is deduplication, but that is still not allowed to run
   in parallel with send;

5) Periodically check if there is contention on the commit root semaphore,
   which means there is a transaction commit trying to write lock it, and
   release the semaphore and reschedule if there is contention, so as to
   avoid causing any significant delays to transaction commits.

This leaves some room for optimizations for send to have less path
releases and re searching the trees when there's relocation running, but
for now it's kept simple as it performs quite well (on very large trees
with resulting send streams in the order of a few hundred gigabytes).

Test case btrfs/187, from fstests, stresses relocation, send and
deduplication attempting to run in parallel, but without verifying if send
succeeds and if it produces correct streams. A new test case will be added
that exercises relocation happening in parallel with send and then checks
that send succeeds and the resulting streams are correct.

A final note is that for now this still leaves the mutual exclusion
between send operations and deduplication on files belonging to a root
used by send operations. A solution for that will be slightly more complex
but it will eventually be built on top of this change.

Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-01-07 14:18:23 +01:00
Josef Bacik
7fcf8a0050 btrfs: remove useless WARN_ON in record_root_in_trans
We don't set SHAREABLE on the extent root, we don't need to have this
safety check here.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-01-03 15:09:49 +01:00
Josef Bacik
29cbcf4017 btrfs: stop accessing ->extent_root directly
When we start having multiple extent roots we'll need to use a helper to
get to the correct extent_root.  Rename fs_info->extent_root to
_extent_root and convert all of the users of the extent root to using
the btrfs_extent_root() helper.  This will allow us to easily clean up
the remaining direct accesses in the future.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-01-03 15:09:49 +01:00
Josef Bacik
826582cabc btrfs: do not special case the extent root for switch commit roots
This is a leftover from when we used to independently swap the extent
root's commit root and the fs tree commit roots.  At the time I simply
changed the helper to a list_add.  There's actually no reason to not add
the extent root to the switch commit root at this point, we don't care
about the order we do the switching since it's all done under the
commit_root_sem.

If we re-mark the extent root dirty after adding it to the
switch_commits list we'll see that BTRFS_ROOT_DIRTY isn't set and then
list_move it back onto the dirty list, and then we'll redo the tree
update and everything will be ok.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-01-03 15:09:48 +01:00
Josef Bacik
7a60751a33 btrfs: remove trans_handle->root
Nobody is using this anymore, remove it.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-01-03 15:09:47 +01:00
Josef Bacik
2e4e97abac btrfs: pass fs_info to trace_btrfs_transaction_commit
The root on the trans->root can be anything, and generally we're
committing from the transaction kthread so it's usually the tree_root.
Change this to just take an fs_info, and to maintain compatibility
simply put the ROOT_TREE_OBJECTID as the root objectid for the
tracepoint.  This will allow use to remove trans->root.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-01-03 15:09:47 +01:00
Josef Bacik
fdfbf02066 btrfs: rework async transaction committing
Currently we do this awful thing where we get another ref on a trans
handle, async off that handle and commit the transaction from that work.
Because we do this we have to mess with current->journal_info and the
freeze counting stuff.

We already have an async thing to kick for the transaction commit, the
transaction kthread.  Replace this work struct with a flag on the
fs_info to tell the kthread to go ahead and commit even if it's before
our timeout.  Then we can drastically simplify the async transaction
commit path.

Note: this can be simplified and functionality based on the pending
operation COMMIT.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
[ add note ]
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-01-03 15:09:46 +01:00
Josef Bacik
9270501c16 btrfs: change root to fs_info for btrfs_reserve_metadata_bytes
We used to need the root for btrfs_reserve_metadata_bytes to check the
orphan cleanup state, but we no longer need that, we simply need the
fs_info.  Change btrfs_reserve_metadata_bytes() to use the fs_info, and
change both btrfs_block_rsv_refill() and btrfs_block_rsv_add() to do the
same as they simply call btrfs_reserve_metadata_bytes() and then
manipulate the block_rsv that is being used.

Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-01-03 15:09:45 +01:00
Filipe Manana
dfba78dc1c btrfs: reduce the scope of the tree log mutex during transaction commit
In the transaction commit path we are acquiring the tree log mutex too
early and we have a stale comment because:

1) It mentions a function named btrfs_commit_tree_roots(), which does not
   exists anymore, it was the old name of commit_cowonly_roots(), renamed
   a very long time ago by commit 5d4f98a28c ("Btrfs: Mixed back
   reference  (FORWARD ROLLING FORMAT CHANGE)"));

2) It mentions that we need to acquire the tree log mutex at that point
   to ensure we have no running log writers. That is not correct anymore,
   for many years at least, since we are guaranteed that we do not have
   any log writers at that point simply because we have set the state of
   the transaction to TRANS_STATE_COMMIT_DOING and have waited for all
   writers to complete - meaning no one can log until we change the state
   of the transaction to TRANS_STATE_UNBLOCKED. Any attempts to join the
   transaction or start a new one will block until we do that state
   transition;

3) The comment mentions a "trans mutex" which doesn't exists since 2011,
   commit a4abeea41a ("Btrfs: kill trans_mutex") removed it;

4) The current use of the tree log mutex is to ensure proper serialization
   of super block writes - if someone started a new transaction and uses it
   for logging, it will wait for the previous transaction to write its
   super block before writing the super block when attempting to sync the
   log.

So acquire the tree log mutex only when it's absolutely needed, before
setting the transaction state to TRANS_STATE_UNBLOCKED, fix and move the
stale comment, add some assertions and new comments where appropriate.

Also, this has no effect on concurrency or performance, since the new
start of the critical section is still when the transaction is in the
state TRANS_STATE_COMMIT_DOING.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-01-03 15:09:44 +01:00
Josef Bacik
8496153945 btrfs: add a BTRFS_FS_ERROR helper
We have a few flags that are inconsistently used to describe the fs in
different states of failure.  As of 5963ffcaf3 ("btrfs: always abort
the transaction if we abort a trans handle") we will always set
BTRFS_FS_STATE_ERROR if we abort, so we don't have to check both ABORTED
and ERROR to see if things have gone wrong.  Add a helper to check
BTRFS_FS_STATE_ERROR and then convert all checkers of FS_STATE_ERROR to
use the helper.

The TRANS_ABORTED bit check was added in af72273381 ("Btrfs: clean up
resources during umount after trans is aborted") but is not actually
specific.

Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-10-26 19:08:05 +02:00
Filipe Manana
79bd37120b btrfs: rework chunk allocation to avoid exhaustion of the system chunk array
Commit eafa4fd0ad ("btrfs: fix exhaustion of the system chunk array
due to concurrent allocations") fixed a problem that resulted in
exhausting the system chunk array in the superblock when there are many
tasks allocating chunks in parallel. Basically too many tasks enter the
first phase of chunk allocation without previous tasks having finished
their second phase of allocation, resulting in too many system chunks
being allocated. That was originally observed when running the fallocate
tests of stress-ng on a PowerPC machine, using a node size of 64K.

However that commit also introduced a deadlock where a task in phase 1 of
the chunk allocation waited for another task that had allocated a system
chunk to finish its phase 2, but that other task was waiting on an extent
buffer lock held by the first task, therefore resulting in both tasks not
making any progress. That change was later reverted by a patch with the
subject "btrfs: fix deadlock with concurrent chunk allocations involving
system chunks", since there is no simple and short solution to address it
and the deadlock is relatively easy to trigger on zoned filesystems, while
the system chunk array exhaustion is not so common.

This change reworks the chunk allocation to avoid the system chunk array
exhaustion. It accomplishes that by making the first phase of chunk
allocation do the updates of the device items in the chunk btree and the
insertion of the new chunk item in the chunk btree. This is done while
under the protection of the chunk mutex (fs_info->chunk_mutex), in the
same critical section that checks for available system space, allocates
a new system chunk if needed and reserves system chunk space. This way
we do not have chunk space reserved until the second phase completes.

The same logic is applied to chunk removal as well, since it keeps
reserved system space long after it is done updating the chunk btree.

For direct allocation of system chunks, the previous behaviour remains,
because otherwise we would deadlock on extent buffers of the chunk btree.
Changes to the chunk btree are by large done by chunk allocation and chunk
removal, which first reserve chunk system space and then later do changes
to the chunk btree. The other remaining cases are uncommon and correspond
to adding a device, removing a device and resizing a device. All these
other cases do not pre-reserve system space, they modify the chunk btree
right away, so they don't hold reserved space for a long period like chunk
allocation and chunk removal do.

The diff of this change is huge, but more than half of it is just addition
of comments describing both how things work regarding chunk allocation and
removal, including both the new behavior and the parts of the old behavior
that did not change.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.12+
Tested-by: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>
Tested-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Tested-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-07-07 17:42:41 +02:00
Filipe Manana
1cb3db1cf3 btrfs: fix deadlock with concurrent chunk allocations involving system chunks
When a task attempting to allocate a new chunk verifies that there is not
currently enough free space in the system space_info and there is another
task that allocated a new system chunk but it did not finish yet the
creation of the respective block group, it waits for that other task to
finish creating the block group. This is to avoid exhaustion of the system
chunk array in the superblock, which is limited, when we have a thundering
herd of tasks allocating new chunks. This problem was described and fixed
by commit eafa4fd0ad ("btrfs: fix exhaustion of the system chunk array
due to concurrent allocations").

However there are two very similar scenarios where this can lead to a
deadlock:

1) Task B allocated a new system chunk and task A is waiting on task B
   to finish creation of the respective system block group. However before
   task B ends its transaction handle and finishes the creation of the
   system block group, it attempts to allocate another chunk (like a data
   chunk for an fallocate operation for a very large range). Task B will
   be unable to progress and allocate the new chunk, because task A set
   space_info->chunk_alloc to 1 and therefore it loops at
   btrfs_chunk_alloc() waiting for task A to finish its chunk allocation
   and set space_info->chunk_alloc to 0, but task A is waiting on task B
   to finish creation of the new system block group, therefore resulting
   in a deadlock;

2) Task B allocated a new system chunk and task A is waiting on task B to
   finish creation of the respective system block group. By the time that
   task B enter the final phase of block group allocation, which happens
   at btrfs_create_pending_block_groups(), when it modifies the extent
   tree, the device tree or the chunk tree to insert the items for some
   new block group, it needs to allocate a new chunk, so it ends up at
   btrfs_chunk_alloc() and keeps looping there because task A has set
   space_info->chunk_alloc to 1, but task A is waiting for task B to
   finish creation of the new system block group and release the reserved
   system space, therefore resulting in a deadlock.

In short, the problem is if a task B needs to allocate a new chunk after
it previously allocated a new system chunk and if another task A is
currently waiting for task B to complete the allocation of the new system
chunk.

Unfortunately this deadlock scenario introduced by the previous fix for
the system chunk array exhaustion problem does not have a simple and short
fix, and requires a big change to rework the chunk allocation code so that
chunk btree updates are all made in the first phase of chunk allocation.
And since this deadlock regression is being frequently hit on zoned
filesystems and the system chunk array exhaustion problem is triggered
in more extreme cases (originally observed on PowerPC with a node size
of 64K when running the fallocate tests from stress-ng), revert the
changes from that commit. The next patch in the series, with a subject
of "btrfs: rework chunk allocation to avoid exhaustion of the system
chunk array" does the necessary changes to fix the system chunk array
exhaustion problem.

Reported-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/20210621015922.ewgbffxuawia7liz@naota-xeon/
Fixes: eafa4fd0ad ("btrfs: fix exhaustion of the system chunk array due to concurrent allocations")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.12+
Tested-by: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>
Tested-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Tested-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-07-07 17:42:40 +02:00
Filipe Manana
35b22c19af btrfs: send: fix crash when memory allocations trigger reclaim
When doing a send we don't expect the task to ever start a transaction
after the initial check that verifies if commit roots match the regular
roots. This is because after that we set current->journal_info with a
stub (special value) that signals we are in send context, so that we take
a read lock on an extent buffer when reading it from disk and verifying
it is valid (its generation matches the generation stored in the parent).
This stub was introduced in 2014 by commit a26e8c9f75 ("Btrfs: don't
clear uptodate if the eb is under IO") in order to fix a concurrency issue
between send and balance.

However there is one particular exception where we end up needing to start
a transaction and when this happens it results in a crash with a stack
trace like the following:

[60015.902283] kernel: WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 58159 at arch/x86/include/asm/kfence.h:44 kfence_protect_page+0x21/0x80
[60015.902292] kernel: Modules linked in: uinput rfcomm snd_seq_dummy (...)
[60015.902384] kernel: CPU: 3 PID: 58159 Comm: btrfs Not tainted 5.12.9-300.fc34.x86_64 #1
[60015.902387] kernel: Hardware name: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. To be filled by O.E.M./F2A88XN-WIFI, BIOS F6 12/24/2015
[60015.902389] kernel: RIP: 0010:kfence_protect_page+0x21/0x80
[60015.902393] kernel: Code: ff 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 55 48 89 fd (...)
[60015.902396] kernel: RSP: 0018:ffff9fb583453220 EFLAGS: 00010246
[60015.902399] kernel: RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: ffff9fb583453224
[60015.902401] kernel: RDX: ffff9fb583453224 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000
[60015.902402] kernel: RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
[60015.902404] kernel: R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000002
[60015.902406] kernel: R13: ffff9fb583453348 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000001
[60015.902408] kernel: FS:  00007f158e62d8c0(0000) GS:ffff93bd37580000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[60015.902410] kernel: CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[60015.902412] kernel: CR2: 0000000000000039 CR3: 00000001256d2000 CR4: 00000000000506e0
[60015.902414] kernel: Call Trace:
[60015.902419] kernel:  kfence_unprotect+0x13/0x30
[60015.902423] kernel:  page_fault_oops+0x89/0x270
[60015.902427] kernel:  ? search_module_extables+0xf/0x40
[60015.902431] kernel:  ? search_bpf_extables+0x57/0x70
[60015.902435] kernel:  kernelmode_fixup_or_oops+0xd6/0xf0
[60015.902437] kernel:  __bad_area_nosemaphore+0x142/0x180
[60015.902440] kernel:  exc_page_fault+0x67/0x150
[60015.902445] kernel:  asm_exc_page_fault+0x1e/0x30
[60015.902450] kernel: RIP: 0010:start_transaction+0x71/0x580
[60015.902454] kernel: Code: d3 0f 84 92 00 00 00 80 e7 06 0f 85 63 (...)
[60015.902456] kernel: RSP: 0018:ffff9fb5834533f8 EFLAGS: 00010246
[60015.902458] kernel: RAX: 0000000000000001 RBX: 0000000000000001 RCX: 0000000000000000
[60015.902460] kernel: RDX: 0000000000000801 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000039
[60015.902462] kernel: RBP: ffff93bc0a7eb800 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000
[60015.902463] kernel: R10: 0000000000098a00 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: 0000000000000001
[60015.902464] kernel: R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff93bc0c92b000 R15: ffff93bc0c92b000
[60015.902468] kernel:  btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_inode+0x5d/0x120
[60015.902473] kernel:  btrfs_evict_inode+0x2c5/0x3f0
[60015.902476] kernel:  evict+0xd1/0x180
[60015.902480] kernel:  inode_lru_isolate+0xe7/0x180
[60015.902483] kernel:  __list_lru_walk_one+0x77/0x150
[60015.902487] kernel:  ? iput+0x1a0/0x1a0
[60015.902489] kernel:  ? iput+0x1a0/0x1a0
[60015.902491] kernel:  list_lru_walk_one+0x47/0x70
[60015.902495] kernel:  prune_icache_sb+0x39/0x50
[60015.902497] kernel:  super_cache_scan+0x161/0x1f0
[60015.902501] kernel:  do_shrink_slab+0x142/0x240
[60015.902505] kernel:  shrink_slab+0x164/0x280
[60015.902509] kernel:  shrink_node+0x2c8/0x6e0
[60015.902512] kernel:  do_try_to_free_pages+0xcb/0x4b0
[60015.902514] kernel:  try_to_free_pages+0xda/0x190
[60015.902516] kernel:  __alloc_pages_slowpath.constprop.0+0x373/0xcc0
[60015.902521] kernel:  ? __memcg_kmem_charge_page+0xc2/0x1e0
[60015.902525] kernel:  __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x30a/0x340
[60015.902528] kernel:  pipe_write+0x30b/0x5c0
[60015.902531] kernel:  ? set_next_entity+0xad/0x1e0
[60015.902534] kernel:  ? switch_mm_irqs_off+0x58/0x440
[60015.902538] kernel:  __kernel_write+0x13a/0x2b0
[60015.902541] kernel:  kernel_write+0x73/0x150
[60015.902543] kernel:  send_cmd+0x7b/0xd0
[60015.902545] kernel:  send_extent_data+0x5a3/0x6b0
[60015.902549] kernel:  process_extent+0x19b/0xed0
[60015.902551] kernel:  btrfs_ioctl_send+0x1434/0x17e0
[60015.902554] kernel:  ? _btrfs_ioctl_send+0xe1/0x100
[60015.902557] kernel:  _btrfs_ioctl_send+0xbf/0x100
[60015.902559] kernel:  ? enqueue_entity+0x18c/0x7b0
[60015.902562] kernel:  btrfs_ioctl+0x185f/0x2f80
[60015.902564] kernel:  ? psi_task_change+0x84/0xc0
[60015.902569] kernel:  ? _flat_send_IPI_mask+0x21/0x40
[60015.902572] kernel:  ? check_preempt_curr+0x2f/0x70
[60015.902576] kernel:  ? selinux_file_ioctl+0x137/0x1e0
[60015.902579] kernel:  ? expand_files+0x1cb/0x1d0
[60015.902582] kernel:  ? __x64_sys_ioctl+0x82/0xb0
[60015.902585] kernel:  __x64_sys_ioctl+0x82/0xb0
[60015.902588] kernel:  do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40
[60015.902591] kernel:  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
[60015.902595] kernel: RIP: 0033:0x7f158e38f0ab
[60015.902599] kernel: Code: ff ff ff 85 c0 79 9b (...)
[60015.902602] kernel: RSP: 002b:00007ffcb2519bf8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
[60015.902605] kernel: RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffcb251ae00 RCX: 00007f158e38f0ab
[60015.902607] kernel: RDX: 00007ffcb2519cf0 RSI: 0000000040489426 RDI: 0000000000000004
[60015.902608] kernel: RBP: 0000000000000004 R08: 00007f158e297640 R09: 00007f158e297640
[60015.902610] kernel: R10: 0000000000000008 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
[60015.902612] kernel: R13: 0000000000000002 R14: 00007ffcb251aee0 R15: 0000558c1a83e2a0
[60015.902615] kernel: ---[ end trace 7bbc33e23bb887ae ]---

This happens because when writing to the pipe, by calling kernel_write(),
we end up doing page allocations using GFP_HIGHUSER | __GFP_ACCOUNT as the
gfp flags, which allow reclaim to happen if there is memory pressure. This
allocation happens at fs/pipe.c:pipe_write().

If the reclaim is triggered, inode eviction can be triggered and that in
turn can result in starting a transaction if the inode has a link count
of 0. The transaction start happens early on during eviction, when we call
btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_inode() at btrfs_evict_inode(). This happens if
there is currently an open file descriptor for an inode with a link count
of 0 and the reclaim task gets a reference on the inode before that
descriptor is closed, in which case the reclaim task ends up doing the
final iput that triggers the inode eviction.

When we have assertions enabled (CONFIG_BTRFS_ASSERT=y), this triggers
the following assertion at transaction.c:start_transaction():

    /* Send isn't supposed to start transactions. */
    ASSERT(current->journal_info != BTRFS_SEND_TRANS_STUB);

And when assertions are not enabled, it triggers a crash since after that
assertion we cast current->journal_info into a transaction handle pointer
and then dereference it:

   if (current->journal_info) {
       WARN_ON(type & TRANS_EXTWRITERS);
       h = current->journal_info;
       refcount_inc(&h->use_count);
       (...)

Which obviously results in a crash due to an invalid memory access.

The same type of issue can happen during other memory allocations we
do directly in the send code with kmalloc (and friends) as they use
GFP_KERNEL and therefore may trigger reclaim too, which started to
happen since 2016 after commit e780b0d1c1 ("btrfs: send: use
GFP_KERNEL everywhere").

The issue could be solved by setting up a NOFS context for the entire
send operation so that reclaim could not be triggered when allocating
memory or pages through kernel_write(). However that is not very friendly
and we can in fact get rid of the send stub because:

1) The stub was introduced way back in 2014 by commit a26e8c9f75
   ("Btrfs: don't clear uptodate if the eb is under IO") to solve an
   issue exclusive to when send and balance are running in parallel,
   however there were other problems between balance and send and we do
   not allow anymore to have balance and send run concurrently since
   commit 9e967495e0 ("Btrfs: prevent send failures and crashes due
   to concurrent relocation"). More generically the issues are between
   send and relocation, and that last commit eliminated only the
   possibility of having send and balance run concurrently, but shrinking
   a device also can trigger relocation, and on zoned filesystems we have
   relocation of partially used block groups triggered automatically as
   well. The previous patch that has a subject of:

   "btrfs: ensure relocation never runs while we have send operations running"

   Addresses all the remaining cases that can trigger relocation.

2) We can actually allow starting and even committing transactions while
   in a send context if needed because send is not holding any locks that
   would block the start or the commit of a transaction.

So get rid of all the logic added by commit a26e8c9f75 ("Btrfs: don't
clear uptodate if the eb is under IO"). We can now always call
clear_extent_buffer_uptodate() at verify_parent_transid() since send is
the only case that uses commit roots without having a transaction open or
without holding the commit_root_sem.

Reported-by: Chris Murphy <lists@colorremedies.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CAJCQCtRQ57=qXo3kygwpwEBOU_CA_eKvdmjP52sU=eFvuVOEGw@mail.gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-22 14:11:58 +02:00
Naohiro Aota
44365827cc btrfs: fix unbalanced unlock in qgroup_account_snapshot()
qgroup_account_snapshot() is trying to unlock the not taken
tree_log_mutex in a error path. Since ret != 0 in this case, we can
just return from here.

Fixes: 2a4d84c11a ("btrfs: move delayed ref flushing for qgroup into qgroup helper")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.12+
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-22 14:11:57 +02:00
David Sterba
ae5d29d4e7 btrfs: inline wait_current_trans_commit_start in its caller
Function wait_current_trans_commit_start is now fairly trivial so it can
be inlined in its only caller.

Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-21 15:19:11 +02:00