hamza.kesraoui/sst-linux
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

fs/jffs2: fix comments mentioning i_mutex

Browse Source 
inode->i_mutex has been replaced with inode->i_rwsem long ago. Fix
comments still mentioning i_mutex.

Signed-off-by: hongnanli <hongnan.li@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
This commit is contained in:
hongnanli 2022-02-11 11:19:28 +08:00 committed by Richard Weinberger
parent c3c07fc25f
commit 163b438b51
1 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
fs/jffs2/jffs2_fs_i.h
View File

@ -18,11 +18,11 @@
#include <linux/mutex.h> #include <linux/mutex.h>
struct jffs2_inode_info { struct jffs2_inode_info {
/* We need an internal mutex similar to inode->i_mutex. /* We need an internal mutex similar to inode->i_rwsem.
Unfortunately, we can't used the existing one, because Unfortunately, we can't used the existing one, because
either the GC would deadlock, or we'd have to release it either the GC would deadlock, or we'd have to release it
before letting GC proceed. Or we'd have to put ugliness before letting GC proceed. Or we'd have to put ugliness
into the GC code so it didn't attempt to obtain the i_mutex into the GC code so it didn't attempt to obtain the i_rwsem
for the inode(s) which are already locked */ for the inode(s) which are already locked */
struct mutex sem; struct mutex sem;