260 lines
7.9 KiB
Python
260 lines
7.9 KiB
Python
"""
|
|
=================================
|
|
Combine predictors using stacking
|
|
=================================
|
|
|
|
.. currentmodule:: sklearn
|
|
|
|
Stacking refers to a method to blend estimators. In this strategy, some
|
|
estimators are individually fitted on some training data while a final
|
|
estimator is trained using the stacked predictions of these base estimators.
|
|
|
|
In this example, we illustrate the use case in which different regressors are
|
|
stacked together and a final linear penalized regressor is used to output the
|
|
prediction. We compare the performance of each individual regressor with the
|
|
stacking strategy. Stacking slightly improves the overall performance.
|
|
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
# Authors: Guillaume Lemaitre <g.lemaitre58@gmail.com>
|
|
# Maria Telenczuk <https://github.com/maikia>
|
|
# License: BSD 3 clause
|
|
|
|
# %%
|
|
# Download the dataset
|
|
######################
|
|
#
|
|
# We will use the `Ames Housing`_ dataset which was first compiled by Dean De Cock
|
|
# and became better known after it was used in Kaggle challenge. It is a set
|
|
# of 1460 residential homes in Ames, Iowa, each described by 80 features. We
|
|
# will use it to predict the final logarithmic price of the houses. In this
|
|
# example we will use only 20 most interesting features chosen using
|
|
# GradientBoostingRegressor() and limit number of entries (here we won't go
|
|
# into the details on how to select the most interesting features).
|
|
#
|
|
# The Ames housing dataset is not shipped with scikit-learn and therefore we
|
|
# will fetch it from `OpenML`_.
|
|
#
|
|
# .. _`Ames Housing`: http://jse.amstat.org/v19n3/decock.pdf
|
|
# .. _`OpenML`: https://www.openml.org/d/42165
|
|
|
|
import numpy as np
|
|
|
|
from sklearn.datasets import fetch_openml
|
|
from sklearn.utils import shuffle
|
|
|
|
|
|
def load_ames_housing():
|
|
df = fetch_openml(name="house_prices", as_frame=True)
|
|
X = df.data
|
|
y = df.target
|
|
|
|
features = [
|
|
"YrSold",
|
|
"HeatingQC",
|
|
"Street",
|
|
"YearRemodAdd",
|
|
"Heating",
|
|
"MasVnrType",
|
|
"BsmtUnfSF",
|
|
"Foundation",
|
|
"MasVnrArea",
|
|
"MSSubClass",
|
|
"ExterQual",
|
|
"Condition2",
|
|
"GarageCars",
|
|
"GarageType",
|
|
"OverallQual",
|
|
"TotalBsmtSF",
|
|
"BsmtFinSF1",
|
|
"HouseStyle",
|
|
"MiscFeature",
|
|
"MoSold",
|
|
]
|
|
|
|
X = X.loc[:, features]
|
|
X, y = shuffle(X, y, random_state=0)
|
|
|
|
X = X.iloc[:600]
|
|
y = y.iloc[:600]
|
|
return X, np.log(y)
|
|
|
|
|
|
X, y = load_ames_housing()
|
|
|
|
# %%
|
|
# Make pipeline to preprocess the data
|
|
######################################
|
|
#
|
|
# Before we can use Ames dataset we still need to do some preprocessing.
|
|
# First, we will select the categorical and numerical columns of the dataset to
|
|
# construct the first step of the pipeline.
|
|
|
|
from sklearn.compose import make_column_selector
|
|
|
|
cat_selector = make_column_selector(dtype_include=object)
|
|
num_selector = make_column_selector(dtype_include=np.number)
|
|
cat_selector(X)
|
|
|
|
# %%
|
|
num_selector(X)
|
|
|
|
# %%
|
|
# Then, we will need to design preprocessing pipelines which depends on the
|
|
# ending regressor. If the ending regressor is a linear model, one needs to
|
|
# one-hot encode the categories. If the ending regressor is a tree-based model
|
|
# an ordinal encoder will be sufficient. Besides, numerical values need to be
|
|
# standardized for a linear model while the raw numerical data can be treated
|
|
# as is by a tree-based model. However, both models need an imputer to
|
|
# handle missing values.
|
|
#
|
|
# We will first design the pipeline required for the tree-based models.
|
|
|
|
from sklearn.compose import make_column_transformer
|
|
from sklearn.impute import SimpleImputer
|
|
from sklearn.pipeline import make_pipeline
|
|
from sklearn.preprocessing import OrdinalEncoder
|
|
|
|
cat_tree_processor = OrdinalEncoder(
|
|
handle_unknown="use_encoded_value",
|
|
unknown_value=-1,
|
|
encoded_missing_value=-2,
|
|
)
|
|
num_tree_processor = SimpleImputer(strategy="mean", add_indicator=True)
|
|
|
|
tree_preprocessor = make_column_transformer(
|
|
(num_tree_processor, num_selector), (cat_tree_processor, cat_selector)
|
|
)
|
|
tree_preprocessor
|
|
|
|
# %%
|
|
# Then, we will now define the preprocessor used when the ending regressor
|
|
# is a linear model.
|
|
|
|
from sklearn.preprocessing import OneHotEncoder, StandardScaler
|
|
|
|
cat_linear_processor = OneHotEncoder(handle_unknown="ignore")
|
|
num_linear_processor = make_pipeline(
|
|
StandardScaler(), SimpleImputer(strategy="mean", add_indicator=True)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
linear_preprocessor = make_column_transformer(
|
|
(num_linear_processor, num_selector), (cat_linear_processor, cat_selector)
|
|
)
|
|
linear_preprocessor
|
|
|
|
# %%
|
|
# Stack of predictors on a single data set
|
|
##########################################
|
|
#
|
|
# It is sometimes tedious to find the model which will best perform on a given
|
|
# dataset. Stacking provide an alternative by combining the outputs of several
|
|
# learners, without the need to choose a model specifically. The performance of
|
|
# stacking is usually close to the best model and sometimes it can outperform
|
|
# the prediction performance of each individual model.
|
|
#
|
|
# Here, we combine 3 learners (linear and non-linear) and use a ridge regressor
|
|
# to combine their outputs together.
|
|
#
|
|
# .. note::
|
|
# Although we will make new pipelines with the processors which we wrote in
|
|
# the previous section for the 3 learners, the final estimator
|
|
# :class:`~sklearn.linear_model.RidgeCV()` does not need preprocessing of
|
|
# the data as it will be fed with the already preprocessed output from the 3
|
|
# learners.
|
|
|
|
from sklearn.linear_model import LassoCV
|
|
|
|
lasso_pipeline = make_pipeline(linear_preprocessor, LassoCV())
|
|
lasso_pipeline
|
|
|
|
# %%
|
|
from sklearn.ensemble import RandomForestRegressor
|
|
|
|
rf_pipeline = make_pipeline(tree_preprocessor, RandomForestRegressor(random_state=42))
|
|
rf_pipeline
|
|
|
|
# %%
|
|
from sklearn.ensemble import HistGradientBoostingRegressor
|
|
|
|
gbdt_pipeline = make_pipeline(
|
|
tree_preprocessor, HistGradientBoostingRegressor(random_state=0)
|
|
)
|
|
gbdt_pipeline
|
|
|
|
# %%
|
|
from sklearn.ensemble import StackingRegressor
|
|
from sklearn.linear_model import RidgeCV
|
|
|
|
estimators = [
|
|
("Random Forest", rf_pipeline),
|
|
("Lasso", lasso_pipeline),
|
|
("Gradient Boosting", gbdt_pipeline),
|
|
]
|
|
|
|
stacking_regressor = StackingRegressor(estimators=estimators, final_estimator=RidgeCV())
|
|
stacking_regressor
|
|
|
|
# %%
|
|
# Measure and plot the results
|
|
##############################
|
|
#
|
|
# Now we can use Ames Housing dataset to make the predictions. We check the
|
|
# performance of each individual predictor as well as of the stack of the
|
|
# regressors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
import time
|
|
|
|
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
|
|
|
|
from sklearn.metrics import PredictionErrorDisplay
|
|
from sklearn.model_selection import cross_val_predict, cross_validate
|
|
|
|
fig, axs = plt.subplots(2, 2, figsize=(9, 7))
|
|
axs = np.ravel(axs)
|
|
|
|
for ax, (name, est) in zip(
|
|
axs, estimators + [("Stacking Regressor", stacking_regressor)]
|
|
):
|
|
scorers = {"R2": "r2", "MAE": "neg_mean_absolute_error"}
|
|
|
|
start_time = time.time()
|
|
scores = cross_validate(
|
|
est, X, y, scoring=list(scorers.values()), n_jobs=-1, verbose=0
|
|
)
|
|
elapsed_time = time.time() - start_time
|
|
|
|
y_pred = cross_val_predict(est, X, y, n_jobs=-1, verbose=0)
|
|
scores = {
|
|
key: (
|
|
f"{np.abs(np.mean(scores[f'test_{value}'])):.2f} +- "
|
|
f"{np.std(scores[f'test_{value}']):.2f}"
|
|
)
|
|
for key, value in scorers.items()
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
display = PredictionErrorDisplay.from_predictions(
|
|
y_true=y,
|
|
y_pred=y_pred,
|
|
kind="actual_vs_predicted",
|
|
ax=ax,
|
|
scatter_kwargs={"alpha": 0.2, "color": "tab:blue"},
|
|
line_kwargs={"color": "tab:red"},
|
|
)
|
|
ax.set_title(f"{name}\nEvaluation in {elapsed_time:.2f} seconds")
|
|
|
|
for name, score in scores.items():
|
|
ax.plot([], [], " ", label=f"{name}: {score}")
|
|
ax.legend(loc="upper left")
|
|
|
|
plt.suptitle("Single predictors versus stacked predictors")
|
|
plt.tight_layout()
|
|
plt.subplots_adjust(top=0.9)
|
|
plt.show()
|
|
|
|
# %%
|
|
# The stacked regressor will combine the strengths of the different regressors.
|
|
# However, we also see that training the stacked regressor is much more
|
|
# computationally expensive.
|