 1829851cfe
			
		
	
	
		1829851cfe
		
	
	
	
	
		
			
			Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
		
			
				
	
	
		
			287 lines
		
	
	
		
			9.9 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			Plaintext
		
	
	
	
	
	
			
		
		
	
	
			287 lines
		
	
	
		
			9.9 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			Plaintext
		
	
	
	
	
	
|            QEMU Monitor Protocol Specification - Version 0.1
 | |
| 
 | |
| 1. Introduction
 | |
| ===============
 | |
| 
 | |
| This document specifies the QEMU Monitor Protocol (QMP), a JSON-based protocol
 | |
| which is available for applications to control QEMU at the machine-level.
 | |
| 
 | |
| To enable QMP support, QEMU has to be run in "control mode". This is done by
 | |
| starting QEMU with the appropriate command-line options. Please, refer to the
 | |
| QEMU manual page for more information.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 2. Protocol Specification
 | |
| =========================
 | |
| 
 | |
| This section details the protocol format. For the purpose of this document
 | |
| "Client" is any application which is communicating with QEMU in control mode,
 | |
| and "Server" is QEMU itself.
 | |
| 
 | |
| JSON data structures, when mentioned in this document, are always in the
 | |
| following format:
 | |
| 
 | |
|     json-DATA-STRUCTURE-NAME
 | |
| 
 | |
| Where DATA-STRUCTURE-NAME is any valid JSON data structure, as defined by
 | |
| the JSON standard:
 | |
| 
 | |
| http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4627.txt
 | |
| 
 | |
| For convenience, json-object members and json-array elements mentioned in
 | |
| this document will be in a certain order. However, in real protocol usage
 | |
| they can be in ANY order, thus no particular order should be assumed.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 2.1 General Definitions
 | |
| -----------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| 2.1.1 All interactions transmitted by the Server are json-objects, always
 | |
|       terminating with CRLF
 | |
| 
 | |
| 2.1.2 All json-objects members are mandatory when not specified otherwise
 | |
| 
 | |
| 2.2 Server Greeting
 | |
| -------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| Right when connected the Server will issue a greeting message, which signals
 | |
| that the connection has been successfully established and that the Server is
 | |
| ready for capabilities negotiation (for more information refer to section
 | |
| '4. Capabilities Negotiation').
 | |
| 
 | |
| The format is:
 | |
| 
 | |
| { "QMP": { "version": json-object, "capabilities": json-array } }
 | |
| 
 | |
|  Where,
 | |
| 
 | |
| - The "version" member contains the Server's version information (the format
 | |
|   is the same of the 'query-version' command)
 | |
| - The "capabilities" member specify the availability of features beyond the
 | |
|   baseline specification
 | |
| 
 | |
| 2.3 Issuing Commands
 | |
| --------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| The format for command execution is:
 | |
| 
 | |
| { "execute": json-string, "arguments": json-object, "id": json-value }
 | |
| 
 | |
|  Where,
 | |
| 
 | |
| - The "execute" member identifies the command to be executed by the Server
 | |
| - The "arguments" member is used to pass any arguments required for the
 | |
|   execution of the command, it is optional when no arguments are required
 | |
| - The "id" member is a transaction identification associated with the
 | |
|   command execution, it is optional and will be part of the response if
 | |
|   provided
 | |
| 
 | |
| 2.4 Commands Responses
 | |
| ----------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| There are two possible responses which the Server will issue as the result
 | |
| of a command execution: success or error.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 2.4.1 success
 | |
| -------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| The success response is issued when the command execution has finished
 | |
| without errors.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The format is:
 | |
| 
 | |
| { "return": json-object, "id": json-value }
 | |
| 
 | |
|  Where,
 | |
| 
 | |
| - The "return" member contains the command returned data, which is defined
 | |
|   in a per-command basis or an empty json-object if the command does not
 | |
|   return data
 | |
| - The "id" member contains the transaction identification associated
 | |
|   with the command execution (if issued by the Client)
 | |
| 
 | |
| 2.4.2 error
 | |
| -----------
 | |
| 
 | |
| The error response is issued when the command execution could not be
 | |
| completed because of an error condition.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The format is:
 | |
| 
 | |
| { "error": { "class": json-string, "data": json-object, "desc": json-string },
 | |
|   "id": json-value }
 | |
| 
 | |
|  Where,
 | |
| 
 | |
| - The "class" member contains the error class name (eg. "ServiceUnavailable")
 | |
| - The "data" member contains specific error data and is defined in a
 | |
|   per-command basis, it will be an empty json-object if the error has no data
 | |
| - The "desc" member is a human-readable error message. Clients should
 | |
|   not attempt to parse this message.
 | |
| - The "id" member contains the transaction identification associated with
 | |
|   the command execution (if issued by the Client)
 | |
| 
 | |
| NOTE: Some errors can occur before the Server is able to read the "id" member,
 | |
| in these cases the "id" member will not be part of the error response, even
 | |
| if provided by the client.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 2.5 Asynchronous events
 | |
| -----------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| As a result of state changes, the Server may send messages unilaterally
 | |
| to the Client at any time. They are called 'asynchronous events'.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The format is:
 | |
| 
 | |
| { "event": json-string, "data": json-object,
 | |
|   "timestamp": { "seconds": json-number, "microseconds": json-number } }
 | |
| 
 | |
|  Where,
 | |
| 
 | |
| - The "event" member contains the event's name
 | |
| - The "data" member contains event specific data, which is defined in a
 | |
|   per-event basis, it is optional
 | |
| - The "timestamp" member contains the exact time of when the event occurred
 | |
|   in the Server. It is a fixed json-object with time in seconds and
 | |
|   microseconds
 | |
| 
 | |
| For a listing of supported asynchronous events, please, refer to the
 | |
| qmp-events.txt file.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 3. QMP Examples
 | |
| ===============
 | |
| 
 | |
| This section provides some examples of real QMP usage, in all of them
 | |
| 'C' stands for 'Client' and 'S' stands for 'Server'.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 3.1 Server greeting
 | |
| -------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| S: {"QMP": {"version": {"qemu": "0.12.50", "package": ""}, "capabilities": []}}
 | |
| 
 | |
| 3.2 Simple 'stop' execution
 | |
| ---------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| C: { "execute": "stop" }
 | |
| S: {"return": {}}
 | |
| 
 | |
| 3.3 KVM information
 | |
| -------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| C: { "execute": "query-kvm", "id": "example" }
 | |
| S: {"return": {"enabled": true, "present": true}, "id": "example"}
 | |
| 
 | |
| 3.4 Parsing error
 | |
| ------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| C: { "execute": }
 | |
| S: {"error": {"class": "JSONParsing", "desc": "Invalid JSON syntax", "data":
 | |
| {}}}
 | |
| 
 | |
| 3.5 Powerdown event
 | |
| -------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| S: {"timestamp": {"seconds": 1258551470, "microseconds": 802384}, "event":
 | |
| "POWERDOWN"}
 | |
| 
 | |
| 4. Capabilities Negotiation
 | |
| ----------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| When a Client successfully establishes a connection, the Server is in
 | |
| Capabilities Negotiation mode.
 | |
| 
 | |
| In this mode only the 'qmp_capabilities' command is allowed to run, all
 | |
| other commands will return the CommandNotFound error. Asynchronous messages
 | |
| are not delivered either.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Clients should use the 'qmp_capabilities' command to enable capabilities
 | |
| advertised in the Server's greeting (section '2.2 Server Greeting') they
 | |
| support.
 | |
| 
 | |
| When the 'qmp_capabilities' command is issued, and if it does not return an
 | |
| error, the Server enters in Command mode where capabilities changes take
 | |
| effect, all commands (except 'qmp_capabilities') are allowed and asynchronous
 | |
| messages are delivered.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 5 Compatibility Considerations
 | |
| ------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| All protocol changes or new features which modify the protocol format in an
 | |
| incompatible way are disabled by default and will be advertised by the
 | |
| capabilities array (section '2.2 Server Greeting'). Thus, Clients can check
 | |
| that array and enable the capabilities they support.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The QMP Server performs a type check on the arguments to a command.  It
 | |
| generates an error if a value does not have the expected type for its
 | |
| key, or if it does not understand a key that the Client included.  The
 | |
| strictness of the Server catches wrong assumptions of Clients about
 | |
| the Server's schema.  Clients can assume that, when such validation
 | |
| errors occur, they will be reported before the command generated any
 | |
| side effect.
 | |
| 
 | |
| However, Clients must not assume any particular:
 | |
| 
 | |
| - Length of json-arrays
 | |
| - Size of json-objects; in particular, future versions of QEMU may add
 | |
|   new keys and Clients should be able to ignore them.
 | |
| - Order of json-object members or json-array elements
 | |
| - Amount of errors generated by a command, that is, new errors can be added
 | |
|   to any existing command in newer versions of the Server
 | |
| 
 | |
| Of course, the Server does guarantee to send valid JSON.  But apart from
 | |
| this, a Client should be "conservative in what they send, and liberal in
 | |
| what they accept".
 | |
| 
 | |
| 6. Downstream extension of QMP
 | |
| ------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| We recommend that downstream consumers of QEMU do *not* modify QMP.
 | |
| Management tools should be able to support both upstream and downstream
 | |
| versions of QMP without special logic, and downstream extensions are
 | |
| inherently at odds with that.
 | |
| 
 | |
| However, we recognize that it is sometimes impossible for downstreams to
 | |
| avoid modifying QMP.  Both upstream and downstream need to take care to
 | |
| preserve long-term compatibility and interoperability.
 | |
| 
 | |
| To help with that, QMP reserves JSON object member names beginning with
 | |
| '__' (double underscore) for downstream use ("downstream names").  This
 | |
| means upstream will never use any downstream names for its commands,
 | |
| arguments, errors, asynchronous events, and so forth.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Any new names downstream wishes to add must begin with '__'.  To
 | |
| ensure compatibility with other downstreams, it is strongly
 | |
| recommended that you prefix your downstram names with '__RFQDN_' where
 | |
| RFQDN is a valid, reverse fully qualified domain name which you
 | |
| control.  For example, a qemu-kvm specific monitor command would be:
 | |
| 
 | |
|     (qemu) __org.linux-kvm_enable_irqchip
 | |
| 
 | |
| Downstream must not change the server greeting (section 2.2) other than
 | |
| to offer additional capabilities.  But see below for why even that is
 | |
| discouraged.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Section '5 Compatibility Considerations' applies to downstream as well
 | |
| as to upstream, obviously.  It follows that downstream must behave
 | |
| exactly like upstream for any input not containing members with
 | |
| downstream names ("downstream members"), except it may add members
 | |
| with downstream names to its output.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Thus, a client should not be able to distinguish downstream from
 | |
| upstream as long as it doesn't send input with downstream members, and
 | |
| properly ignores any downstream members in the output it receives.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Advice on downstream modifications:
 | |
| 
 | |
| 1. Introducing new commands is okay.  If you want to extend an existing
 | |
|    command, consider introducing a new one with the new behaviour
 | |
|    instead.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 2. Introducing new asynchronous messages is okay.  If you want to extend
 | |
|    an existing message, consider adding a new one instead.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 3. Introducing new errors for use in new commands is okay.  Adding new
 | |
|    errors to existing commands counts as extension, so 1. applies.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 4. New capabilities are strongly discouraged.  Capabilities are for
 | |
|    evolving the basic protocol, and multiple diverging basic protocol
 | |
|    dialects are most undesirable.
 |