target/arm: Use aarch32_cpsr_valid_mask in helper_exception_return
Using ~0 as the mask on the aarch64->aarch32 exception return was not even as correct as the CPSR_ERET_MASK that we had used on the aarch32->aarch32 exception return. Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org> Message-id: 20200208125816.14954-9-richard.henderson@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
437864216d
commit
d203cabd1b
@ -959,7 +959,7 @@ void HELPER(exception_return)(CPUARMState *env, uint64_t new_pc)
|
|||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
int cur_el = arm_current_el(env);
|
int cur_el = arm_current_el(env);
|
||||||
unsigned int spsr_idx = aarch64_banked_spsr_index(cur_el);
|
unsigned int spsr_idx = aarch64_banked_spsr_index(cur_el);
|
||||||
uint32_t spsr = env->banked_spsr[spsr_idx];
|
uint32_t mask, spsr = env->banked_spsr[spsr_idx];
|
||||||
int new_el;
|
int new_el;
|
||||||
bool return_to_aa64 = (spsr & PSTATE_nRW) == 0;
|
bool return_to_aa64 = (spsr & PSTATE_nRW) == 0;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@ -1014,7 +1014,8 @@ void HELPER(exception_return)(CPUARMState *env, uint64_t new_pc)
|
|||||||
* will sort the register banks out for us, and we've already
|
* will sort the register banks out for us, and we've already
|
||||||
* caught all the bad-mode cases in el_from_spsr().
|
* caught all the bad-mode cases in el_from_spsr().
|
||||||
*/
|
*/
|
||||||
cpsr_write(env, spsr, ~0, CPSRWriteRaw);
|
mask = aarch32_cpsr_valid_mask(env->features, &env_archcpu(env)->isar);
|
||||||
|
cpsr_write(env, spsr, mask, CPSRWriteRaw);
|
||||||
if (!arm_singlestep_active(env)) {
|
if (!arm_singlestep_active(env)) {
|
||||||
env->uncached_cpsr &= ~PSTATE_SS;
|
env->uncached_cpsr &= ~PSTATE_SS;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user