target/riscv: change priv_ver check in validate_profile()

The S profiles do a priv_ver check during validation to see if the
running priv_ver is compatible with it. This check is done by comparing
if the running priv_ver is equal to the priv_ver the profile specifies.

There is an universe where we added RVA23S64 support based on both
RVA23U64 and RVA22S64 and this error is being thrown:

qemu-system-riscv64: warning: Profile rva22s64 requires
    priv spec v1.12.0, but priv ver v1.13.0 was set

We're enabling RVA22S64 (priv_ver 1.12) as a dependency of RVA23S64
(priv_ver 1.13) and complaining to users about what we did ourselves.

There's no drawback in allowing a profile to run in an env that has a
priv_ver newer than it's required by it. So, like Hiro Nakamura saves
the future by changing the past, change the priv_ver check now to allow
profiles to run in a newer priv_ver. This universe will have one less
warning to deal with.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Message-ID: <20250115184316.2344583-5-dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
This commit is contained in:
Daniel Henrique Barboza 2025-01-15 15:43:14 -03:00 committed by Alistair Francis
parent 1813fc68c4
commit 08dfc19454

View File

@ -746,7 +746,7 @@ static void riscv_cpu_validate_profile(RISCVCPU *cpu,
#endif
if (profile->priv_spec != RISCV_PROFILE_ATTR_UNUSED &&
profile->priv_spec != env->priv_ver) {
profile->priv_spec > env->priv_ver) {
profile_impl = false;
if (send_warn) {