// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1 -analyzer-checker=core,debug.ExprInspection -verify %s -analyzer-config eagerly-assume=false // Tests for c11 atomics. Many of these tests currently yield unknown // because we don't fully model the atomics and instead imprecisely // treat their arguments as escaping. typedef unsigned int uint32_t; typedef enum memory_order { memory_order_relaxed = __ATOMIC_RELAXED, memory_order_consume = __ATOMIC_CONSUME, memory_order_acquire = __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE, memory_order_release = __ATOMIC_RELEASE, memory_order_acq_rel = __ATOMIC_ACQ_REL, memory_order_seq_cst = __ATOMIC_SEQ_CST } memory_order; void clang_analyzer_eval(int); struct RefCountedStruct { uint32_t refCount; void *ptr; }; void test_atomic_fetch_add(struct RefCountedStruct *s) { s->refCount = 1; uint32_t result = __c11_atomic_fetch_add((volatile _Atomic(uint32_t) *)&s->refCount,- 1, memory_order_relaxed); // When we model atomics fully this should (probably) be FALSE. It should never // be TRUE (because the operation mutates the passed in storage). clang_analyzer_eval(s->refCount == 1); // expected-warning {{UNKNOWN}} // When fully modeled this should be TRUE clang_analyzer_eval(result == 1); // expected-warning {{UNKNOWN}} } void test_atomic_load(struct RefCountedStruct *s) { s->refCount = 1; uint32_t result = __c11_atomic_load((volatile _Atomic(uint32_t) *)&s->refCount, memory_order_relaxed); // When we model atomics fully this should (probably) be TRUE. clang_analyzer_eval(s->refCount == 1); // expected-warning {{UNKNOWN}} // When fully modeled this should be TRUE clang_analyzer_eval(result == 1); // expected-warning {{UNKNOWN}} } void test_atomic_store(struct RefCountedStruct *s) { s->refCount = 1; __c11_atomic_store((volatile _Atomic(uint32_t) *)&s->refCount, 2, memory_order_relaxed); // When we model atomics fully this should (probably) be FALSE. It should never // be TRUE (because the operation mutates the passed in storage). clang_analyzer_eval(s->refCount == 1); // expected-warning {{UNKNOWN}} } void test_atomic_exchange(struct RefCountedStruct *s) { s->refCount = 1; uint32_t result = __c11_atomic_exchange((volatile _Atomic(uint32_t) *)&s->refCount, 2, memory_order_relaxed); // When we model atomics fully this should (probably) be FALSE. It should never // be TRUE (because the operation mutates the passed in storage). clang_analyzer_eval(s->refCount == 1); // expected-warning {{UNKNOWN}} // When fully modeled this should be TRUE clang_analyzer_eval(result == 1); // expected-warning {{UNKNOWN}} } void test_atomic_compare_exchange_strong(struct RefCountedStruct *s) { s->refCount = 1; uint32_t expected = 2; uint32_t desired = 3; _Bool result = __c11_atomic_compare_exchange_strong((volatile _Atomic(uint32_t) *)&s->refCount, &expected, desired, memory_order_relaxed, memory_order_relaxed); // For now we expect both expected and refCount to be invalidated by the // call. In the future we should model more precisely. clang_analyzer_eval(s->refCount == 3); // expected-warning {{UNKNOWN}} clang_analyzer_eval(expected == 2); // expected-warning {{UNKNOWN}} } void test_atomic_compare_exchange_weak(struct RefCountedStruct *s) { s->refCount = 1; uint32_t expected = 2; uint32_t desired = 3; _Bool result = __c11_atomic_compare_exchange_weak((volatile _Atomic(uint32_t) *)&s->refCount, &expected, desired, memory_order_relaxed, memory_order_relaxed); // For now we expect both expected and refCount to be invalidated by the // call. In the future we should model more precisely. clang_analyzer_eval(s->refCount == 3); // expected-warning {{UNKNOWN}} clang_analyzer_eval(expected == 2); // expected-warning {{UNKNOWN}} }