; RUN: opt -S -guard-widening < %s | FileCheck %s ; RUN: opt -S -passes=guard-widening < %s | FileCheck %s declare void @llvm.experimental.guard(i1,...) ; Basic test case: we wide the first check to check both the ; conditions. define void @f_0(i1 %cond_0, i1 %cond_1) { ; CHECK-LABEL: @f_0( entry: ; CHECK: %wide.chk = and i1 %cond_0, %cond_1 ; CHECK: call void (i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %wide.chk) [ "deopt"() ] ; CHECK: ret void call void(i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cond_0) [ "deopt"() ] call void(i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cond_1) [ "deopt"() ] ret void } ; Same as @f_0, but with using a more general notion of postdominance. define void @f_1(i1 %cond_0, i1 %cond_1) { ; CHECK-LABEL: @f_1( entry: ; CHECK: %wide.chk = and i1 %cond_0, %cond_1 ; CHECK: call void (i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %wide.chk) [ "deopt"() ] ; CHECK: br i1 undef, label %left, label %right call void(i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cond_0) [ "deopt"() ] br i1 undef, label %left, label %right left: br label %merge right: br label %merge merge: ; CHECK: merge: ; CHECK-NOT: call void (i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard( ; CHECK: ret void call void(i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cond_1) [ "deopt"() ] ret void } ; Like @f_1, but we have some code we need to hoist before we can ; widen a dominanting check. define void @f_2(i32 %a, i32 %b) { ; CHECK-LABEL: @f_2( entry: ; CHECK: %cond_0 = icmp ult i32 %a, 10 ; CHECK: %cond_1 = icmp ult i32 %b, 10 ; CHECK: %wide.chk = and i1 %cond_0, %cond_1 ; CHECK: call void (i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %wide.chk) [ "deopt"() ] ; CHECK: br i1 undef, label %left, label %right %cond_0 = icmp ult i32 %a, 10 call void(i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cond_0) [ "deopt"() ] br i1 undef, label %left, label %right left: br label %merge right: br label %merge merge: %cond_1 = icmp ult i32 %b, 10 call void(i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cond_1) [ "deopt"() ] ret void } ; Negative test: don't hoist stuff out of control flow ; indiscriminately, since that can make us do more work than needed. define void @f_3(i32 %a, i32 %b) { ; CHECK-LABEL: @f_3( entry: ; CHECK: %cond_0 = icmp ult i32 %a, 10 ; CHECK: call void (i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cond_0) [ "deopt"() ] ; CHECK: br i1 undef, label %left, label %right %cond_0 = icmp ult i32 %a, 10 call void(i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cond_0) [ "deopt"() ] br i1 undef, label %left, label %right left: ; CHECK: left: ; CHECK: %cond_1 = icmp ult i32 %b, 10 ; CHECK: call void (i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cond_1) [ "deopt"() ] ; CHECK: ret void %cond_1 = icmp ult i32 %b, 10 call void(i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cond_1) [ "deopt"() ] ret void right: ret void } ; But hoisting out of control flow is fine if it makes a loop computed ; condition loop invariant. This behavior may require some tuning in ; the future. define void @f_4(i32 %a, i32 %b) { ; CHECK-LABEL: @f_4( entry: ; CHECK: %cond_0 = icmp ult i32 %a, 10 ; CHECK: %cond_1 = icmp ult i32 %b, 10 ; CHECK: %wide.chk = and i1 %cond_0, %cond_1 ; CHECK: call void (i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %wide.chk) [ "deopt"() ] ; CHECK: br i1 undef, label %loop, label %leave %cond_0 = icmp ult i32 %a, 10 call void(i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cond_0) [ "deopt"() ] br i1 undef, label %loop, label %leave loop: %cond_1 = icmp ult i32 %b, 10 call void(i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cond_1) [ "deopt"() ] br i1 undef, label %loop, label %leave leave: ret void } ; Hoisting out of control flow is also fine if we can widen the ; dominating check without doing any extra work. define void @f_5(i32 %a) { ; CHECK-LABEL: @f_5( entry: ; CHECK: %wide.chk = icmp uge i32 %a, 11 ; CHECK: call void (i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %wide.chk) [ "deopt"() ] ; CHECK: br i1 undef, label %left, label %right %cond_0 = icmp ugt i32 %a, 7 call void(i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cond_0) [ "deopt"() ] br i1 undef, label %left, label %right left: %cond_1 = icmp ugt i32 %a, 10 call void(i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cond_1) [ "deopt"() ] ret void right: ret void } ; Negative test: the load from %a can be safely speculated to before ; the first guard, but there is no guarantee that it will produce the ; same value. define void @f_6(i1* dereferenceable(32) %a, i1* %b, i1 %unknown) { ; CHECK-LABEL: @f_6( ; CHECK: call void (i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard( ; CHECK: call void (i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard( ; CHECK: ret void entry: %cond_0 = load i1, i1* %a call void(i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cond_0) [ "deopt"() ] store i1 %unknown, i1* %b %cond_1 = load i1, i1* %a call void(i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cond_1) [ "deopt"() ] ret void } ; All else equal, we try to widen the earliest guard we can. This ; heuristic can use some tuning. define void @f_7(i32 %a, i1* %cond_buf) { ; CHECK-LABEL: @f_7( entry: ; CHECK: %cond_1 = load volatile i1, i1* %cond_buf ; CHECK: %cond_3 = icmp ult i32 %a, 7 ; CHECK: %wide.chk = and i1 %cond_1, %cond_3 ; CHECK: call void (i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %wide.chk) [ "deopt"() ] ; CHECK: %cond_2 = load volatile i1, i1* %cond_buf ; CHECK: call void (i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cond_2) [ "deopt"() ] ; CHECK: br i1 undef, label %left, label %right %cond_1 = load volatile i1, i1* %cond_buf call void(i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cond_1) [ "deopt"() ] %cond_2 = load volatile i1, i1* %cond_buf call void(i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cond_2) [ "deopt"() ] br i1 undef, label %left, label %right left: %cond_3 = icmp ult i32 %a, 7 call void(i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cond_3) [ "deopt"() ] br label %left right: ret void } ; In this case the earliest dominating guard is in a loop, and we ; don't want to put extra work in there. This heuristic can use some ; tuning. define void @f_8(i32 %a, i1 %cond_1, i1 %cond_2) { ; CHECK-LABEL: @f_8( entry: br label %loop loop: call void(i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cond_1) [ "deopt"() ] br i1 undef, label %loop, label %leave leave: ; CHECK: leave: ; CHECK: %cond_3 = icmp ult i32 %a, 7 ; CHECK: %wide.chk = and i1 %cond_2, %cond_3 ; CHECK: call void (i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %wide.chk) [ "deopt"() ] ; CHECK: br i1 undef, label %loop2, label %leave2 call void(i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cond_2) [ "deopt"() ] br i1 undef, label %loop2, label %leave2 loop2: %cond_3 = icmp ult i32 %a, 7 call void(i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cond_3) [ "deopt"() ] br label %loop2 leave2: ret void } ; In cases like these where there isn't any "obviously profitable" ; widening sites, we refuse to do anything. define void @f_9(i32 %a, i1 %cond_0, i1 %cond_1) { ; CHECK-LABEL: @f_9( entry: br label %first_loop first_loop: ; CHECK: first_loop: ; CHECK: call void (i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cond_0) [ "deopt"() ] ; CHECK: br i1 undef, label %first_loop, label %second_loop call void(i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cond_0) [ "deopt"() ] br i1 undef, label %first_loop, label %second_loop second_loop: ; CHECK: second_loop: ; CHECK: call void (i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cond_1) [ "deopt"() ] ; CHECK: br label %second_loop call void(i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cond_1) [ "deopt"() ] br label %second_loop } ; Same situation as in @f_9: no "obviously profitable" widening sites, ; so we refuse to do anything. define void @f_10(i32 %a, i1 %cond_0, i1 %cond_1) { ; CHECK-LABEL: @f_10( entry: br label %loop loop: ; CHECK: loop: ; CHECK: call void (i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cond_0) [ "deopt"() ] ; CHECK: br i1 undef, label %loop, label %no_loop call void(i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cond_0) [ "deopt"() ] br i1 undef, label %loop, label %no_loop no_loop: ; CHECK: no_loop: ; CHECK: call void (i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cond_1) [ "deopt"() ] ; CHECK: ret void call void(i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cond_1) [ "deopt"() ] ret void } ; With guards in loops, we're okay hoisting out the guard into the ; containing loop. define void @f_11(i32 %a, i1 %cond_0, i1 %cond_1) { ; CHECK-LABEL: @f_11( entry: br label %inner inner: ; CHECK: inner: ; CHECK: %wide.chk = and i1 %cond_0, %cond_1 ; CHECK: call void (i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %wide.chk) [ "deopt"() ] ; CHECK: br i1 undef, label %inner, label %outer call void(i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cond_0) [ "deopt"() ] br i1 undef, label %inner, label %outer outer: call void(i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cond_1) [ "deopt"() ] br label %inner } ; Checks that we are adequately guarded against exponential-time ; behavior when hoisting code. define void @f_12(i32 %a0) { ; CHECK-LABEL: @f_12 ; Eliding the earlier 29 multiplications for brevity ; CHECK: %a30 = mul i32 %a29, %a29 ; CHECK-NEXT: %cond = trunc i32 %a30 to i1 ; CHECK-NEXT: %wide.chk = and i1 true, %cond ; CHECK-NEXT: call void (i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %wide.chk) [ "deopt"() ] ; CHECK-NEXT: ret void entry: call void(i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 true) [ "deopt"() ] %a1 = mul i32 %a0, %a0 %a2 = mul i32 %a1, %a1 %a3 = mul i32 %a2, %a2 %a4 = mul i32 %a3, %a3 %a5 = mul i32 %a4, %a4 %a6 = mul i32 %a5, %a5 %a7 = mul i32 %a6, %a6 %a8 = mul i32 %a7, %a7 %a9 = mul i32 %a8, %a8 %a10 = mul i32 %a9, %a9 %a11 = mul i32 %a10, %a10 %a12 = mul i32 %a11, %a11 %a13 = mul i32 %a12, %a12 %a14 = mul i32 %a13, %a13 %a15 = mul i32 %a14, %a14 %a16 = mul i32 %a15, %a15 %a17 = mul i32 %a16, %a16 %a18 = mul i32 %a17, %a17 %a19 = mul i32 %a18, %a18 %a20 = mul i32 %a19, %a19 %a21 = mul i32 %a20, %a20 %a22 = mul i32 %a21, %a21 %a23 = mul i32 %a22, %a22 %a24 = mul i32 %a23, %a23 %a25 = mul i32 %a24, %a24 %a26 = mul i32 %a25, %a25 %a27 = mul i32 %a26, %a26 %a28 = mul i32 %a27, %a27 %a29 = mul i32 %a28, %a28 %a30 = mul i32 %a29, %a29 %cond = trunc i32 %a30 to i1 call void(i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cond) [ "deopt"() ] ret void } define void @f_13(i32 %a) { ; CHECK-LABEL: @f_13( entry: ; CHECK: %wide.chk = icmp ult i32 %a, 10 ; CHECK: call void (i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %wide.chk) [ "deopt"() ] ; CHECK: br i1 undef, label %left, label %right %cond_0 = icmp ult i32 %a, 14 call void(i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cond_0) [ "deopt"() ] br i1 undef, label %left, label %right left: %cond_1 = icmp slt i32 %a, 10 call void(i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cond_1) [ "deopt"() ] ret void right: ret void } define void @f_14(i32 %a) { ; CHECK-LABEL: @f_14( entry: ; CHECK: %cond_0 = icmp ult i32 %a, 14 ; CHECK: call void (i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cond_0) [ "deopt"() ] ; CHECK: br i1 undef, label %left, label %right %cond_0 = icmp ult i32 %a, 14 call void(i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cond_0) [ "deopt"() ] br i1 undef, label %left, label %right left: ; CHECK: left: ; CHECK: %cond_1 = icmp sgt i32 %a, 10 ; CHECK: call void (i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cond_1) [ "deopt"() ] %cond_1 = icmp sgt i32 %a, 10 call void(i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cond_1) [ "deopt"() ] ret void right: ret void } ; Make sure we do not widen guard by trivial true conditions into something. define void @f_15(i1 %cond_0, i1 %cond_1) { ; CHECK-LABEL: @f_15( entry: ; CHECK: call void (i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cond_0) [ "deopt"() ] ; CHECK: call void (i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 true) [ "deopt"() ] ; CHECK: ret void call void(i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cond_0) [ "deopt"() ] call void(i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 true) [ "deopt"() ] ret void } ; Make sure we do not widen guard by trivial false conditions into something. define void @f_16(i1 %cond_0, i1 %cond_1) { ; CHECK-LABEL: @f_16( entry: ; CHECK: call void (i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cond_0) [ "deopt"() ] ; CHECK: call void (i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 false) [ "deopt"() ] ; CHECK: ret void call void(i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cond_0) [ "deopt"() ] call void(i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 false) [ "deopt"() ] ret void }