//===-- Analysis/CFG.h - BasicBlock Analyses --------------------*- C++ -*-===// // // Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions. // See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information. // SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception // //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// // // This family of functions performs analyses on basic blocks, and instructions // contained within basic blocks. // //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// #ifndef LLVM_ANALYSIS_CFG_H #define LLVM_ANALYSIS_CFG_H #include "llvm/ADT/GraphTraits.h" #include "llvm/ADT/SmallPtrSet.h" #include namespace llvm { class BasicBlock; class DominatorTree; class Function; class Instruction; class LoopInfo; template class SmallVectorImpl; /// Analyze the specified function to find all of the loop backedges in the /// function and return them. This is a relatively cheap (compared to /// computing dominators and loop info) analysis. /// /// The output is added to Result, as pairs of edge info. void FindFunctionBackedges( const Function &F, SmallVectorImpl > & Result); /// Search for the specified successor of basic block BB and return its position /// in the terminator instruction's list of successors. It is an error to call /// this with a block that is not a successor. unsigned GetSuccessorNumber(const BasicBlock *BB, const BasicBlock *Succ); /// Return true if the specified edge is a critical edge. Critical edges are /// edges from a block with multiple successors to a block with multiple /// predecessors. /// bool isCriticalEdge(const Instruction *TI, unsigned SuccNum, bool AllowIdenticalEdges = false); bool isCriticalEdge(const Instruction *TI, const BasicBlock *Succ, bool AllowIdenticalEdges = false); /// Determine whether instruction 'To' is reachable from 'From', without passing /// through any blocks in ExclusionSet, returning true if uncertain. /// /// Determine whether there is a path from From to To within a single function. /// Returns false only if we can prove that once 'From' has been executed then /// 'To' can not be executed. Conservatively returns true. /// /// This function is linear with respect to the number of blocks in the CFG, /// walking down successors from From to reach To, with a fixed threshold. /// Using DT or LI allows us to answer more quickly. LI reduces the cost of /// an entire loop of any number of blocks to be the same as the cost of a /// single block. DT reduces the cost by allowing the search to terminate when /// we find a block that dominates the block containing 'To'. DT is most useful /// on branchy code but not loops, and LI is most useful on code with loops but /// does not help on branchy code outside loops. bool isPotentiallyReachable( const Instruction *From, const Instruction *To, const SmallPtrSetImpl *ExclusionSet = nullptr, const DominatorTree *DT = nullptr, const LoopInfo *LI = nullptr); /// Determine whether block 'To' is reachable from 'From', returning /// true if uncertain. /// /// Determine whether there is a path from From to To within a single function. /// Returns false only if we can prove that once 'From' has been reached then /// 'To' can not be executed. Conservatively returns true. bool isPotentiallyReachable(const BasicBlock *From, const BasicBlock *To, const DominatorTree *DT = nullptr, const LoopInfo *LI = nullptr); /// Determine whether there is at least one path from a block in /// 'Worklist' to 'StopBB', returning true if uncertain. /// /// Determine whether there is a path from at least one block in Worklist to /// StopBB within a single function. Returns false only if we can prove that /// once any block in 'Worklist' has been reached then 'StopBB' can not be /// executed. Conservatively returns true. bool isPotentiallyReachableFromMany(SmallVectorImpl &Worklist, BasicBlock *StopBB, const DominatorTree *DT = nullptr, const LoopInfo *LI = nullptr); /// Determine whether there is at least one path from a block in /// 'Worklist' to 'StopBB' without passing through any blocks in /// 'ExclusionSet', returning true if uncertain. /// /// Determine whether there is a path from at least one block in Worklist to /// StopBB within a single function without passing through any of the blocks /// in 'ExclusionSet'. Returns false only if we can prove that once any block /// in 'Worklist' has been reached then 'StopBB' can not be executed. /// Conservatively returns true. bool isPotentiallyReachableFromMany( SmallVectorImpl &Worklist, BasicBlock *StopBB, const SmallPtrSetImpl *ExclusionSet, const DominatorTree *DT = nullptr, const LoopInfo *LI = nullptr); /// Return true if the control flow in \p RPOTraversal is irreducible. /// /// This is a generic implementation to detect CFG irreducibility based on loop /// info analysis. It can be used for any kind of CFG (Loop, MachineLoop, /// Function, MachineFunction, etc.) by providing an RPO traversal (\p /// RPOTraversal) and the loop info analysis (\p LI) of the CFG. This utility /// function is only recommended when loop info analysis is available. If loop /// info analysis isn't available, please, don't compute it explicitly for this /// purpose. There are more efficient ways to detect CFG irreducibility that /// don't require recomputing loop info analysis (e.g., T1/T2 or Tarjan's /// algorithm). /// /// Requirements: /// 1) GraphTraits must be implemented for NodeT type. It is used to access /// NodeT successors. // 2) \p RPOTraversal must be a valid reverse post-order traversal of the /// target CFG with begin()/end() iterator interfaces. /// 3) \p LI must be a valid LoopInfoBase that contains up-to-date loop /// analysis information of the CFG. /// /// This algorithm uses the information about reducible loop back-edges already /// computed in \p LI. When a back-edge is found during the RPO traversal, the /// algorithm checks whether the back-edge is one of the reducible back-edges in /// loop info. If it isn't, the CFG is irreducible. For example, for the CFG /// below (canonical irreducible graph) loop info won't contain any loop, so the /// algorithm will return that the CFG is irreducible when checking the B <- /// -> C back-edge. /// /// (A->B, A->C, B->C, C->B, C->D) /// A /// / \ /// B<- ->C /// | /// D /// template > bool containsIrreducibleCFG(RPOTraversalT &RPOTraversal, const LoopInfoT &LI) { /// Check whether the edge (\p Src, \p Dst) is a reducible loop backedge /// according to LI. I.e., check if there exists a loop that contains Src and /// where Dst is the loop header. auto isProperBackedge = [&](NodeT Src, NodeT Dst) { for (const auto *Lp = LI.getLoopFor(Src); Lp; Lp = Lp->getParentLoop()) { if (Lp->getHeader() == Dst) return true; } return false; }; SmallPtrSet Visited; for (NodeT Node : RPOTraversal) { Visited.insert(Node); for (NodeT Succ : make_range(GT::child_begin(Node), GT::child_end(Node))) { // Succ hasn't been visited yet if (!Visited.count(Succ)) continue; // We already visited Succ, thus Node->Succ must be a backedge. Check that // the head matches what we have in the loop information. Otherwise, we // have an irreducible graph. if (!isProperBackedge(Node, Succ)) return true; } } return false; } } // End llvm namespace #endif